News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Modded Camera Driver for k800i/k810i Bookmark topic

Everyone can see the diferent and quality of all pictures maded with K800, K810 and new one K850 vs N73 and N95. The good camera needs more of one component. Sony is world's leader with or without Carl Ceizz. Pictures with your lovely "Ceizz" are not so clear and sharpness than K850. Fact! Why? Because it is not enough, dude! Because, Nokia and Camera are two different thinks. Like Pepsi and Coca Cola.
--
Posted: 2007-10-23 22:26:51
Edit : Quote


ofcourse lens are not everything!!! but they are the EYE of the camera. The driver is the soul. You can be blind and have a good soul, or eagleeye with a bad soul. Sony is not leader. Olympus is (and cannon). And sony uses vario-tessar lens in digital cameras. As you can see, n95 can take better pictures in low light than k850. K850i also has overexposure problems (like k810 original). cant remember the link, but there was a test with n95 vs k850i. sony had better colors, but overexposed and filtered with a white... net. like lens where dirty. N95 had better details. thats why sony announced that it will use zeiss optics in next cyber-shot. thats what i'm waiting for.
lets not forget about the new samsung. it cleans the floor with both nokia and sony phones.

A direct question about lens (and not software)
would you choose a noname CMOS, or Carl Zeiss optics in next cyber shot phone?
Zeiss = quality (its a pity that nokia doen't use it at max - no good driver)

P.S. Im sure that blindfolded u couldn't tell the difference between pepsi
and coca cola.

[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2007-10-23 21:42 ]

[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2007-10-23 21:45 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-23 22:40:50
Edit : Quote


Olympus - leader? Lol. N95 - better pictures than K850? Lol again. Many people think that even the K800 takes better pics than the N95. Better movie clips - yes, smarter phone - yes, but better pictures? No way!
Oh, yeah, and...you *should* buy that 8 Mp cam-phone from Samsung. It'll break about twice a month, like all Samsung phones do. Good luck wiping flors with SE&Nokia...

By the way, calling the K800 and the K850 crappy(or shitty - don't recall exactly) camera phones...is just not fair. Go for Samsung, man. Best of luck. You'll need plenty.



P.S. CMOS is one thing, optics are another...

_________________
I rock. Period.

[ This Message was edited by: sicko on 2007-10-23 22:18 ]

[ This Message was edited by: sicko on 2007-10-23 22:21 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-23 23:14:22
Edit : Quote


Excuse me. Does k770i use the same camdriver as k790i/k800i/k810i ?
--
Posted: 2007-10-23 23:57:06
Edit : Quote


I have both K800i and N95,will make a comparison later.
but one thing is sure,the K800,even with its anonymous lens and so called by many people "shitty" CMOS sensor,makes a way better images than the "mighty" N95.
I love the n95,dont get me wrong,a built in gps,symbian etc,but when it comes to photography,the K800 is wayyyy better.
--
Posted: 2007-10-23 23:58:31
Edit : Quote


yeah i know. its the sensor. There is a thread with ccd vs cmos. but i forgot link (again). What do u mean break? i had many phones in my life (in fact, 14+) and neither 1 had any problems. and i am a hard gamer/music/movies/sms-er. Had some problems with my k750 (camera button) but time fixed it Here in romania (de unde esti si tu) people say "i buy nokia, because they dont break - last long" . Thats CRAP! i mean what does long lasting mean? you throw/drop it and it wont break into pieces?
About n95 vs k850 vs g600 (and not D series as i mentioned. mistake) ??
k850i had many tests and im not happy with it (hoped for more from a CYBER-SHOT!!! phone)
n95 still not happy with it. sharp pictures, good exposure, good in low light, but colors suck. Firmware should be fixed - loss of detail
g600 i saw 1!!! (one) test with it, and it was enough to see what it can do.
of course it can be better, but its enough for now.

http://www.gophone.com.tw/rep[....]opic_content.jsp?sn=0710110002
http://publish.it168.com/2007/0924/20070924023801.shtml

I like sony ericsson a lot (even when simply ericsson). But its not enough for me (remember what the k750i did back in its times??- ravages!! killed all 2MPx phones, it was a standard theres no toying now.

--
Posted: 2007-10-23 23:59:35
Edit : Quote




http://www.planete-nokia.com/phpBB2/index.php?showtopic=42932
n95 vs k810. AND plz compare pix to stock driver, as n95 is not tuned version. yes k800 can take better pictures, BUT with a modded camdriver. (what would happen if n95 could be modded?)

another 5MPx camera test. just look at the overexposed k850i!! and look at the g600. (sony is only good at macros)
http://www.phonearena.com/htm[....]-Comparison-review-r_1817.html

[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2007-10-23 23:13 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-24 00:06:30
Edit : Quote


well I was talking about the comparison I made with the modded drivers to my N95.
resized the n95 images to 3.2mpx to compare then to a full resolution k800 images.
eventually,not only I,but even my friends had the same notion,that the k800 images (well ,yes,modded drivers) are better,in MOST cases... some low light conditions were better on the n95.
--
Posted: 2007-10-24 00:38:55
Edit : Quote


when did this thread about modded camera drivers for k800/k810i turned into a grudge match with n95? lol


seriously guys... lets focus on making whats already good a little better that is all, im sure there are nokia guys trying to tune the n95 and samsung guys trying to tune what ever samsung makes lol you get the point

cheers.
--
Posted: 2007-10-24 01:41:24
Edit : Quote




yeah right! we're waiting for the best camera driver from number1 and Kopritis. so please, post your arguments in the appropriate forum! LOL

[ This Message was edited by: reywal on 2007-10-24 04:30 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-24 05:29:10
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index