>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2008
Bookmark topic
Well one thing's for sure (or at least I'm pretty sure) that S302 doesn't use A200 platform, but rather the same one found in the Rseries phones.
Honestly, I'm not too sure if the F305 will be that successful. I hope the graphics are at least decent (not saying PSP level, but maybe GameBoy Advance?) I'm worried that's not the case.
--
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:03:47
Edit :
Quote
^^^, so you think
should make another version of all it's mid-high and high-end phones with b prefix at the end ( like G900b ) that will be bulky an have larger phone ?
come on, I know it's better to have larger screen, but you have to agree to that there's no such a phone called the ultimate phone wich had no drawbacks !!
I think 2.0 - 2.2 is the sweet spot for that phone looking at it's market target, having a larger screen will force
to target it at more costly phone, wich mean more close to high-end, and that's mean adding more features to and bangaaaa that walkman won't be a mid-end or high-mid-end phone !!
--
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:07:22
Edit :
Quote
The Japs have 3 inch screens so 2.4 isnt really asking that much. Even the Moto Razr has a bigger screen. Its just that there is always so much room around the screen so it makes it look crap.
--
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:17:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-14 21:17:55, bavlondon2 wrote:
The Japs have 3 inch screens so 2.4 isnt really asking that much. Even the Moto Razr has a bigger screen. Its just that there is always so much room around the screen so it makes it look crap.
In Japane are phones with 3.2 screen: Fujitsu F905i, F906i
--
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:25:45
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-14 20:15:54, bavlondon2 wrote:
Yeah but the demo video also shows a phone with a smaller screen than in the pics. Man I wish SE would make their clamshells with at least 2.4 inch screens.
Even if they make it 3.4 inches,you'll still still moan and whinge about something else......
--
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:25:54
Edit :
Quote
Let's just look at Sony Ericsson's phones in japan: all their phones were at least 2.8"
--
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:28:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-14 21:25:54, chuksy wrote:
On 2008-06-14 20:15:54, bavlondon2 wrote:
Yeah but the demo video also shows a phone with a smaller screen than in the pics. Man I wish SE would make their clamshells with at least 2.4 inch screens.
Even if they make it 3.4 inches,you'll still still moan and whinge about something else......
Of course but at least that will be one less thing to moan about right? Ha ha
--
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:28:52
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-14 21:25:54, chuksy wrote:
On 2008-06-14 20:15:54, bavlondon2 wrote:
Yeah but the demo video also shows a phone with a smaller screen than in the pics. Man I wish SE would make their clamshells with at least 2.4 inch screens.
Even if they make it 3.4 inches,you'll still still moan and whinge about something else......
Let's not do 3.4" haha =P That will make the phone itself too big XD XD XD
--
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:29:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-14 19:54:57, darknoob wrote:
On 2008-06-14 17:29:14, bavlondon2 wrote:
Is Alicia running on A300?
From what you can see in the demo , its running on A200.
I don't think there are physical differences, or many, between A2 and A3. With A1 to A2, we got a third softkey, but with A2 to A3, the differences are mainly behind the scenes (internal WLAN, BT 2.1, etc). So I don't know if it's possible to tell if a phone is A2 or A3 just by looking.
--
Posted: 2008-06-14 23:54:21
Edit :
Quote
laurenke01,
A2 fully supports both W-LAN and Bluetooth 2.1. IMO there's no such thing as A3/A300 yet.
--
Posted: 2008-06-15 00:06:19
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
