>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition
Bookmark topic
Me 2...
Somebody will be on chat? I want but I can't join because of work...
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 19:11:39
Edit :
Quote
The size of the device is no surprise, the thing is almost 6.5 inches. The fact they made it that large yet still compact enough to hold with one hand is a nice touch. The silver device doesn't seem to match the sony france even photo 100%, so perhaps some things changed for production, I am referring to the space between the volume rocker and the power button, minor change so no biggie.
I am not too keen on the pencil and paper thing, I don't want to be using a pencil and paper to write on a device when I can do that on a normal piece of paper. I'd rather just use some stylus to write on the device to take notes on it.
I am still perplexed as to why there are 2 events for the device, one in china and the other in china. If the event in china is meant to be global then the second event in july is pointless imo. Anywho hopefully something more leaks before tomorrow's event or at least the full capabilities of the device will be shown off tomorrow and not just, hey look here it's a giant phablet and then no hands on previews.
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 19:12:54
Edit :
Quote
zomgbbqftw wrote:
Quick run through of the specs again:
6.4" 1080p AH-IPS LCD screen with QLED
Snapdragon 800 2.2GHz
8MP camera Exmor RS with dedicated shutter button
IP55/58 certification
2GB RAM
16GB storage + microSD slot (with native exFAT support)
2970mAh battery
Pressure sensitive input with any device that has a point (like a pencil, as seen in the picture)
~6.5mm thickness
I would have preferred more thickness and a bigger battery. I think the QLED will help though because blue LEDs are less power hungry than white ones.
Something like this probably: Minimum 2900/2970 mAh and typical 2970/3040 mAh. So much for 4000 mAh...
[ This Message was edited by: Detox on 2013-06-24 18:27 ]
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 19:15:16
Edit :
Quote
I don't understand why the IP Code is reported twice. IP55/58, what does that mean? It can't be both.
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 19:21:25
Edit :
Quote
QLED
Pros
1. Color range: Nanocrystal displays should be able to yield a greater portion of the visible spectrum than current technologies. As shown in the diagram, QD Vision calculates as much as 30% more of the visible spectrum would be available using QDs in a QD-LED vs. a CRT TV.
2. Low power consumption: QD Vision estimates its nanocrystal displays could use 30 to 50% less electrical power than an LCD, in large part because nanocrystal displays don't need a backlight.
3. Brightness: 50~100 times brighter than CRT and LCD displays ~40,000 cd/m2
4. Added flexibility: QDs are soluble in both aqueous and non-aqueous solvents, which provides for printable and flexible displays of all sizes, including large area TVs
5. Improved lifetime: QDs are inorganic, which can give the potential for improved lifetimes when compared to alternative OLED technologies. However, since many parts of QD-LED are made of organic materials, further development is required to improve the functional lifetime.
Other advantages include better saturated green, manufacture ability on polymers, thin display, same material used to generate difference colors, and higher resolution.
Cons
1. Less saturated blue: Blue quantum dots are difficult to manufacture due to the timing control during the reaction. A blue quantum dot is just slightly above the minimum size, where red to green can be easily obtained. Sunlight contains roughly equal luminosities of red, green and blue. So in order to display an acceptable range of colors, a display needs to be capable to produce approximately equal luminosities of blue as of red and green (even though in order to achieve the same brightness as perceived by the human eyes, blue needs to be about 5 times more luminous than green; have 5 times more power).
Commercialization of quantum dot display is yet to come. Compared to LCD and OLED, the manufacturing cost of QD-LED is relatively high and development of novel and more cost-efficient fabrication process is desired in future.
[ This Message was edited by: king-james on 2013-06-24 18:23 ]
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 19:22:38
Edit :
Quote
OLED also tend to have shorter life spans.
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 19:34:59
Edit :
Quote
QD uses 30-50% less power than conventional LCDs, IGZO also saves queit lot of energy so despite having bigger screen ZU's screen will be more efficient than Z's S800 is also more efficient than S4 pro and the battery on Z so battery life on ZU will be stellar. Maybe 65+ on GSMarena's test
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 19:35:59
Edit :
Quote
guys whats this
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 20:04:50
Edit :
Quote
No...it looks smaller than 10 inch
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 20:11:17
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-06-24 20:11:17, Spinz wrote:
No...it looks smaller than 10 inch
It really really really is the XTZ.
http://www.sonystyle.com.cn/p[....]sonytablet/xperia_tablet_z.htm
--
Posted: 2013-06-24 20:21:10
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
