Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : C905 CamDriver Modded
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > C905 CamDriver Modded Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 117118119 ... 291292293>

mauasca Posts: 196


On 2009-09-08 20:44:37, eltoffer wrote:
thanks mikely

@mauasca

i can see the same problem as before your lens seems to be dirty in the pics taken with my driver
[ This Message was edited by: eltoffer on 2009-09-08 19:45 ]



I am sorry,:-(
the lens is not dirty, I clean before of the test;-)
[ This Message was edited by: mauasca on 2009-09-08 22:17 ]

--
Posted: 2009-09-08 23:16:12
Edit : Quote

anouk82 Posts: > 500


On 2009-09-08 12:28:14, igica11 wrote:
Firs of all I am not very familiar with modding camdrive but I ask one question.
OK you manage to increase file size of jpg. But I dont understand, why you dont change quantization table in camdrive. As I have seen you use the same quantization table as original camdrive, which is design for lower bits. In my camdrive I change original quantization with jpeg standard quantization q=80( found it http://www.dfrws.org/2008/proceedings/p21-kornblum.pdf ) and I think images are sharper and more precise
[ This Message was edited by: igica11 on 2009-09-08 11:29 ]


can you give us an example?your pics...
--
Posted: 2009-09-08 23:26:29
Edit : Quote

eltoffer Posts: 348


On 2009-09-08 23:16:12, mauasca wrote:

On 2009-09-08 20:44:37, eltoffer wrote:
thanks mikely

@mauasca

i can see the same problem as before your lens seems to be dirty in the pics taken with my driver
[ This Message was edited by: eltoffer on 2009-09-08 19:45 ]



I am sorry,:-(
the lens is not dirty, I clean before of the test;-)
[ This Message was edited by: mauasca on 2009-09-08 22:17 ]





it really seem so blurry o fuzzy
--
Posted: 2009-09-09 02:31:19
Edit : Quote

rajac Posts: 76

DM 3.2 nightshot 2s




--
Posted: 2009-09-09 05:03:30
Edit : Quote

wilson123123 Posts: 3


On 2009-09-09 05:03:30, rajac wrote:
DM 3.2 nightshot 2s






hey rajac~
Even meet you here ~
--
Posted: 2009-09-09 06:02:36
Edit : Quote

rajac Posts: 76

@Wilson123123
Hi!Wilson.Nice to meet you here,too.
--
Posted: 2009-09-09 06:17:48
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500


On 2009-09-08 13:11:45, igica11 wrote:
OK, if quantization table is not used for normal pictures for what is than used?? Why is quantization table writen in camdrive if it doesnt have any influence on picture quality?? Tnx

I don't know, in K750 and K800 they were for nothing and I don't think that anything has changed for C905. you can change all values to very small numbers like 10 and verify results. in this way quantization tables should simulate very high compression (very low jpeg quality)
--
Posted: 2009-09-09 13:30:35
Edit : Quote

igica11 Posts: 19


On 2009-09-08 23:26:29, anouk82 wrote:

On 2009-09-08 12:28:14, igica11 wrote:
Firs of all I am not very familiar with modding camdrive but I ask one question.
OK you manage to increase file size of jpg. But I dont understand, why you dont change quantization table in camdrive. As I have seen you use the same quantization table as original camdrive, which is design for lower bits. In my camdrive I change original quantization with jpeg standard quantization q=80( found it http://www.dfrws.org/2008/proceedings/p21-kornblum.pdf ) and I think images are sharper and more precise
[ This Message was edited by: igica11 on 2009-09-08 11:29 ]


can you give us an example?your pics...


Okej you can download my modificated version of camdrive and see yourself. Notice that my camdrive is 96% based on original camdrive (because I dont like too much saturation and unnatural sharpening) and just compresion and exposure are changed-nothing radical. With this camdrive I manage to do 6,45MB picture of grass.

http://www.mediafire.com/?sha[....]a4fc82078ae6c8e04e75f6e8ebb871

bye
--
Posted: 2009-09-09 18:11:04
Edit : Quote

igica11 Posts: 19


On 2009-09-09 13:30:35, Raiderski wrote:

On 2009-09-08 13:11:45, igica11 wrote:
OK, if quantization table is not used for normal pictures for what is than used?? Why is quantization table writen in camdrive if it doesnt have any influence on picture quality?? Tnx

you can change all values to very small numbers like 10 and verify results. in this way quantization tables should simulate very high compression (very low jpeg quality)



I remeber that small numbers in quantization table means better quality
[ This Message was edited by: igica11 on 2009-09-09 17:43 ]

--
Posted: 2009-09-09 18:41:31
Edit : Quote

rajac Posts: 76

Where's DM? I can't see him for a long time...
--
Posted: 2009-09-09 20:30:53
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 117118119 ... 291292293>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home