>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
The back is correct. It ain't a Kia.
--
Posted: 2014-04-17 07:39:29
Edit :
Quote
LOL, even the phone says "No". Coincidence? I think not.
--
Posted: 2014-04-17 08:56:32
Edit :
Quote
hah yeah.. I don't know what happened.. I am tempted to just get rid of all the letters
Here is a quick comp vs a Canon S90
canon
http://2.static.img-dpreview.[....]e28068c5c3446281057bf6d29da945
nokia
http://2.static.img-dpreview.[....]fdc75ef8454d609d10ad6e5b1457d4
Sometimes the images from the 808 come out so clean its beautiful
--
Posted: 2014-04-19 00:02:45
Edit :
Quote
emerson_shei Posts: > 500
'2048' for Symbian
http://www.allaboutsymbian.co[....]tem/19700_2048_for_Symbian.php
--
Posted: 2014-04-22 00:00:17
Edit :
Quote
Thats a lot for a "dead" system. Symbian is stronger than ever
--
Posted: 2014-04-22 21:15:49
Edit :
Quote
I haven't fired up the cam on this for a while.. every time I do.. impressed
On 2014-04-22 21:15:49, fbloise wrote:
Thats a lot for a "dead" system. Symbian is stronger than ever
Its certainly more stable than ever.. That last update to 10.1 really helped. Considering how feature rich the OS is, I am surprised that there aren't more problems. Also.. considering Nokia's incompetence when it comes to software.
On 2014-04-09 14:50:57, mlife wrote:
Unless a manufacturer is willing to forgo the idea of super slim phones and add larger sensors -OR- sensor technology gets significantly better regarding size and density, this will be the case for next few years, I fear.
Yeah, I think we are at least a few years away from brand new sensor technology that doesn't rely on the physical size of whatever it is that collects the light. Graphene seems to be one direction, but I feel like that thing is everyone now, and yet again it can't seem to leave the lab...its all concepts..
--
Posted: 2014-04-22 22:40:02
Edit :
Quote
emerson_shei Posts: > 500
Some thoughts about PureView and the future
http://pureviewclub.com/2014/22835
--
Posted: 2014-04-23 05:15:01
Edit :
Quote
I confess voting 10+ on every photo taken by a 808 Pureview (and help that way keeting 808 photos as the highest ranked).
--
Posted: 2014-04-23 09:26:10
Edit :
Quote
^
if you vote based on raw IQ .. there is no other way but to vote on the high end. The voting system here sucks anyway.. I don't even bother
nice read emerson shei
Yeah, its a special gadget indeed..
I see it as an over-engineered pioneering device that was meant to showcase what Nokia's imaging team and the Zeiss team were capable of. There hasn't been such a huge leap forward in the industry for years. I am glad that they released it to the public.. its one of those devices that could've stayed in the labs forever.
I am sure that there will be new technology that will surpass it sooner than later, but considering how fast everything is moving in the tech world, to hold the crown in any aspect for longer than a few months is an achievement, let alone 2 years...
Here, this is an interesting concept for something new..
http://blog.falklumo.com/2013[....]hy-new-dual-pixel-af-will.html
maybe some of it can trickle down to mobiles eventually
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2014-04-23 08:32 ]
--
Posted: 2014-04-23 09:31:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-04-23 09:26:10, fbloise wrote:
I confess voting 10+ on every photo taken by a 808 Pureview (and help that way keeting 808 photos as the highest ranked).
That is just as bad as voting 1
ps. Photo section new style is in progress but it may take a while. A long while
--
Posted: 2014-04-23 12:15:34
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
