>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> Nokia N90 Success in Doubt?
Bookmark topic
Quote:slightly worse size
slightly??? man, you are really a joke
i guess you also think the weight and the battery are also slightly worse, as well as the price lol
why donīt you put this in this perspective: a mighty n series phone, that is much bigger, much heavier, has hyped CZ glass lenses, costs the same as a laptop, - takes worse photos, donīt matter if itīs slightly, than the k750 - well, i see this as a faillure lol With all the stuff i mentioned, it should take better photos than the k750...but it doesnīt
--
Posted: 2005-08-26 11:02:31
Edit :
Quote
arez:
You have to look at it in perspective.
To those who desired smartphone features, smartphone size a huge improvement when compared to a laptop. So different in size between K750 & N90 becomes insignificant if you see it from this angle.
Quote:takes worse photos, donīt matter if itīs slightly, than the k750 - well, i see this as a faillure lol
why are you just pre-occupied with camera camera camera. Ah, I think I know. That's the only thing you could talk about for a K750.
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2005-08-26 13:42 ]
--
Posted: 2005-08-26 14:12:24
Edit :
Quote
But Arez is allowed to mention the camera, the K750 is a cameraphone!
He is right in what he says. To put all those features in to a new phone and have it that size is no big deal. Where is the great leap forward exactly? The brickia is huge even by year 2000 standards. It should have been the size of a 6630, THAT would have been cool.
This message was posted from a S700
--
Posted: 2005-08-26 15:28:57
Edit :
Quote
mib1800, for the 100th time, both k750 and n90 are marketed as revolutionary cameraphones, and the camera is their most talked feature...so itīs obvious to analyze both in this prespective...if you think that is wrong, and that n90 should have been promoted a different way, go tell nokia
nokia promoted it like it was a photo wonder handset, the best ever, but sadly it lost to a much cheaper handset like the k750 - that is a faillure, like it or not
[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-08-26 15:44 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-08-26 15:48 ]
--
Posted: 2005-08-26 16:40:50
Edit :
Quote
well said nokia have created another ngage with this huge expensive let down of a phone the only problem is it wont really dent their profits which is a shame
--
Posted: 2005-08-26 16:54:03
Edit :
Quote
goldenface:
sure. arez can mentioned it. K750i is cameraphone. You can use camera to say K750i beat N90. However, N90 is also a smart/3G/multimedia phone. So it should OK for me to say N90 beat the K750 in these aspects. Seems like hypocricy to me if anyone have any problem with this.
arez:
Quote:
nokia promoted it like it was a photo wonder handset, the best ever, but sadly it lost to a much cheaper handset like the k750 - that is a faillure, like it or not
"photo" set. I thought Nokia promoted N90 multimedia. Since you started this. How about we talk about about video recording/streaming, multi-format media support, big and high resolution screen, full screen high frame rate playback, bundled multimedia software... It is quite obvious K750 will be put to shame here. Need I say more
--
Posted: 2005-08-26 17:47:27
Edit :
Quote
No shame...k750 never pretended to be something it isnīt...as a product it achieved entirely its objectives, with great sucess. Please, get real
And remember, k750 doesnīt have any Carl Zeiss sticker lol
You talk about features that were never mentioned for the k750, no one buys a k750 for that...need i explain, AGAIN, what makes k750 a killer phone (that n90 isnīt)???? Iīm tired lol
By the way, did you or will you buy the brick with the CZ sticker, that you seem to like so much???
_________________
k750i + hbh 600
http://pbase.com/ares - photography by ares aka antonioj
[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-08-26 17:07 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-08-26 17:08 ]
--
Posted: 2005-08-26 18:01:46
Edit :
Quote
arez:
Quote:You talk about features that were never mentioned for the k750,
no one buys a k750 for that...need i explain, AGAIN, what makes k750 a killer phone (that n90 isnīt)
Now you have said it Exactly. So no one buys the N90 just for its camera ONLY!!!. I agree with you if all you want is a good camera ONLY, then K750 would be a killer phone but not in any other aspects. If you want a true MULTIMEDIA then N90 would be a killer phone.
Me buy N90? No. I am waiting for N91 which is the true killer device -WIFI, 2MP, 4Gb disk space + 32Mb internal, mini-USB port/drive, standard jack, Series60 smartphone, 32Mb RAM (no more RAM problem when multi-task many programs together).
--
Posted: 2005-08-27 03:01:46
Edit :
Quote
@mib1800
This K750i v N90 comparison is really boring me.
Quote:
"However, N90 is also a smart/3G/multimedia phone. So it should OK for me to say N90 beat the K750 in these aspects. Seems like hypocricy to me if anyone have any problem with this."
But you are comparing features of the N90 to features that the K750i
doesn't have!!!!!!
If I walked into a shop looking for a 3G smartphone do you really think I would expect the Sales Assistant to present me with a K750i? Really?
He'd have a screw loose if he did now wouldn't he?
The K750i is a camera phone so the cameras can be compared.
However, I think the best way these two products can be compared is on their success.
The K750i = runaway success The N90 = questionable?
The thread, according to the main article, is about why it is doubtful that the N90 will be successful and thats because of its bulk, and probably because it looks like hell on a Monday morning!!
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2005-09-01 09:18 ]
--
Posted: 2005-08-31 17:09:20
Edit :
Quote
not sure if this link has been posted but i post it anyway cant be bothered to go through 9 pages to look
a guy on mobile burn says he has a production ready model of the n90 and has taken some pics with it so have a look see what you think
http://forums.mobileburn.com/showthread.php?p=95337#post95337
--
Posted: 2005-08-31 19:31:25
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
