>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Which one is better, N95 or K850?
Bookmark topic
Before we forget, here are the specs to the phone of the gods: k850i
http://www.gsmarena.com/vote.php3 (just to check the voting)
General Network HSDPA / GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
Size Dimensions 102 x 48 x 17 mm
Weight 118 g
Display Type TFT, 256K colors
Size 240 x 320 pixels, 2.2 inches
- Wallpapers, screensavers
Ringtones Type Polyphonic (72 channels), MP3
Customization Composer, download
Vibration Yes
Memory Phonebook 1000 x 20 fields, Photo call
Call records 30 received, dialed and missed calls
Card slot Memory Stick Micro (M2)/microSD , 512 MB card included
- 40 MB internal memory
Data GPRS Class 10 (4+1/3+2 slots), 32 - 48 kbps
HSCSD Yes
EDGE Yes
3G HSDPA, 3.6 Mbps (K850i only)
WLAN No
Bluetooth Yes, v2.0 with A2DP
Infrared port No
USB Yes, v2.0
Features Messaging SMS, MMS, Email, Instant Messaging
Browser WAP 2.0/HTML (NetFront), RSS reader
Games Yes + downloadable
Colors Luminous Green, Velvet Blue
Camera 5 MP, 2592х1944 pixels, autofocus, video(QVGA@30fps), xenon flash and 3LED video light; auto lens cover, secondary videocall camera
- Java MIDP 2.0
- FM radio with RDS
- MP3/AAC/MPEG4 player
- Motion sensor (with UI auto-rotate)
- TrackID music recognition
- T9
- Image viewer
- Picture editor/blogging
- Organiser
- Built-in handsfree
- Voice memo/dial
Battery Standard battery, Li-Po 930 mAh (BST-38)
Stand-by Up to 400 h
Talk time Up to 9 h
The phone for the common man:
Network HSDPA / GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
Size Dimensions 99 x 53 x 21 mm, 90 cc
Weight 120 g
Display Type TFT, 16M colors
Size 240 x 320 pixels, 40 x 53 mm
Ringtones Type Polyphonic (64 channels), Monophonic, True Tones, MP3
Customization Download
Vibration Yes
Memory Phonebook Yes
Call records Yes
Card slot microSD (up to 4GB), hot swap, 128 MB card included, buy memory
160 MB internal memory
Data GPRS Class 10 (4+1/3+2 slots), 32 - 48 kbps
HSCSD Yes
EDGE Class 32, 296 kbps; DTM Class 11, 177 kbps
3G HSDPA
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, UPnP technology
Bluetooth Yes, v2.0, A2DP
Infrared port Yes
USB Yes, v2.0 miniUSB
Features OS Symbian OS 9.2, S60 rel. 3.1
Messaging SMS, MMS, Email, Instant Messaging
Browser WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML
Games Downloadable, order now
Colors Silver
Camera 5 MP, 2592 x 1944 pixels, Carl Zeiss optics, autofocus, video(VGA 30fps), flash; secondary CIF videocall camera
- Built-in GPS navigation
- Installed Maps application covering over 100 countries
- Dual slide design
- Java MIDP 2.0
- MP3/AAC/AAC+/eAAC+/WMA player
- 3.5 mm audio output jack
- TV out
- Stereo FM Radio
- Organiser
- Office document viewer
- T9
- Push to talk
- Voice dial/memo
- Built-in handsfree
Battery Standard battery, Li-Ion 950 mAh (BL-5F)
Stand-by Up to 220 h
Talk time Up to 6 h 30 min
After looking at both, is there really any comparison? SE may, maybe, hopefulling, fingers crossed, hold your breath, produce a better camera in this phone, but then what? Can it hope on the Net with wifi? Nope. Can it point the way if lost? Nope. How about screens? Shall the embarrassment continue or do certain individuals finally get the point?
Class dismissed.
_________________
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*
-/..../../...//.../../-/.//../...//--./---/../-./--.//-/---//-/...././/-../-
[ This Message was edited by: sapporobaby on 2007-07-11 09:41 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 07:57:37
Edit :
Quote
@ dogmann
hey dude... k850 is a "cameraphone" not a smartphone, just like the k800 which was sold 5 million times
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 10:03:57
Edit :
Quote
@k850 successor
I wasn't the one that started this comparison or tries to claim that the K950 is so much better. Lets face it in that case you can never compare a Nokia to a SE as Nokia make smartphones is this end of the market and give you everything not segmented like SE with Walkman or Cybershot but never the best of both and that really is the big difference in the two companies philosophy.
Buy an SE and get the best of one with the mediocre of the other buy the Nokia and get it all plus real customer support and wealth of great free apps both from Nokia themselves and developers. Now you tell me which seems like a better deal then? and yes it is a loaded question but as the saying goes the truth hurts.
Marc
_________________
Nokia N95, 2gb Sandisk, Fring Shure EC2g
Nokia E61 2gb Sandisk, Fring, Tom Tom 6
Dogmanns N95 Blog Experience @
http://dogmann.vox.com/[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2007-07-12 01:28 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-12 02:27:46
Edit :
Quote
both companies will do what they think is best for their customers, regardless of what company is actually better than the other. You have the choice to be either a customer of SE or nokia. So why not leave it at that? N95 is a great phone, but no doubt the K850 will be too. It just depends what you like in a phone. Theres no need for a debate to decide which phone is better, what will that do? You already know what phone you want for your needs and which one is best for YOU not OTHERS so take it and enjoy it!
[ This Message was edited by: soane28 on 2007-07-12 03:52 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-12 03:40:13
Edit :
Quote
If u want a good phone with all the features go for nokia, but but but, if u want every feature very exlusive then go for SE. That what i belive.
--
Posted: 2007-07-12 04:51:36
Edit :
Quote
Wouldn't this thread finish faster if you idiots people could agree on instead of comparing the whole phones, just compare a specific feature like the camera?
From that point of view I would say that both phones suck equally!!!
--
Posted: 2007-07-12 05:49:56
Edit :
Quote
@AbuBasim,
Wouldn't this thread be better if people would get over the fact that cameras on phone are a waste of time and anyone that has a drop of photographic understand would know that camera phones will NEVER compete with dedicated digital cameras? Don't you think?
--
Posted: 2007-07-12 08:38:59
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-07-12 04:51:36, Samlala wrote:
If u want a good phone with all the features go for nokia, but but but, if u want every feature very exlusive then go for SE. That what i belive.
eehhh. maybe, but if you want a phone who have horrible chassis design, unstable software, the worst batterylife (in the history probably), go for the N95....:=)
_________________
k810i
w810i
T28
k850i booked
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-07-12 08:18 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-12 09:16:12
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-07-12 09:16:12, plankgatan wrote:
On 2007-07-12 04:51:36, Samlala wrote:
If u want a good phone with all the features go for nokia, but but but, if u want every feature very exlusive then go for SE. That what i belive.
eehhh. maybe, but if you want a phone who have horrible chassis design, unstable software, the worst batterylife (in the history probably), go for the N95....:=)
_________________
k810i
w810i
T28
k850i booked
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-07-12 08:18 ]
kuttay ke dum hamesha terhi rehti hai!
--
Posted: 2007-07-12 09:23:55
Edit :
Quote
I wouldnt go to that extreme over the N95 - battery is the only main problem with it.
cam quality on mobiles at present isnt too bad - by no means a photographers dream, but good for basic snaps when you forgot your digicam.
And once again, it is down to your choice. If you like N95 good for you, if you dont and prefer the K850, great. The phone is ment to suit you and only you. Whats the point of debating your preference of a phone to someone that doesnt share your preference? What a waste of time!
--
Posted: 2007-07-12 09:32:29
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
