Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : All about camdriver modding (for modders)
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > All about camdriver modding (for modders) Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 121314 ... 282930>

alvink83 Posts: 20


On 2008-03-01 13:36:12, Raiderski wrote:
it's value corresponding to maximum exposure time of snapshot with used flash



So, it's useless when the flash is disabled. Right?
What is the best value for taking a portrait?
--
Posted: 2008-03-01 14:03:08
Edit : Quote

sadeghi85 Posts: 341


On 2008-02-29 23:19:46, jomateixa wrote:
Please guys stop...Disabling WB is a stupidity itself. JPEG compression mods too.


Agree 100%, especially with the compression part.


[ This Message was edited by: sadeghi85 on 2008-03-01 13:48 ]
--
Posted: 2008-03-01 14:42:52
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

whitebalance off does make a difference so i will always use whitebalance off don't bother arguing with me i ain't changing my mind.
there is some point to modding the jpeg compression it really only makes a difference on vga & 1mp mode arcording to jpeg snoop my pictures are uncompressed. 2mp mode i can get 98% compression & 3mp mode max seems to be 97% same as standard driver. increasing file sizes makes no noticeable difference but i just prefer 800kb-900kb rather than 600kb-900kb.


--
Posted: 2008-03-02 18:04:07
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

sorry guys but i just can't read nonsenses... can you?

LOL number1 you just roxx - i'm a fan of you!

1.
whitebalance off - do you understand what are you talking about? i don't think so. i can only repeat: auto white balance in your driver is ON! you're blind or you don't know what is auto white balance. do you feel that white balance is off in your bones or what?

2.

arcording to jpeg snoop my pictures are uncompressed


OMG! you really don't understand what you're talking about! you have RAW pictures, you re truly genius! especially for you: even jpeg with 100% quality is still COMPRESSED file

man, please stop this nonsense! you completely don't know what you are talking about! people, someone please explain this to him

--
Posted: 2008-03-02 19:02:30
Edit : Quote

jomateixa Posts: > 500


On 2008-03-02 19:02:30, Raiderski wrote:
sorry guys but i just can't read nonsenses... can you?

LOL number1 you just roxx - i'm a fan of you!

1.
whitebalance off - do you understand what are you talking about? i don't think so. i can only repeat: auto white balance in your driver is ON! you're blind or you don't know what is auto white balance. do you feel that white balance is off in your bones or what?

2.

arcording to jpeg snoop my pictures are uncompressed


OMG! you really don't understand what you're talking about! you have RAW pictures, you re truly genius! especially for you: even jpeg with 100% quality is still COMPRESSED file

man, please stop this nonsense! you completely don't know what you are talking about! people, someone please explain this to him




Number1 I agree with Raiderski, you showed to us several times that you don't have the knowledge, STOP saying stupidities. You showed us too that you have 17 years old. You don't have to be right in everything, Raiderski already showed you that your WB OFF is not WB OFF...what do you want more?

P.D.- JPEG compression mod is the greatest stupidity that we can do, as our eyes can't see it.

[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:17 ]

[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:19 ]
--
Posted: 2008-03-02 19:10:57
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

From VGA
*** Marker: DQT ***
Define a Quantization Table.
OFFSET: 0x000016B4
Table length = 132
----
Precision=8 bits
Destination ID=0 (Luminance)
DQT, Row #0: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #2: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #3: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #4: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #5: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #6: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #7: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approx quality factor = 100.00 (scaling=2.99 variance=6.13)
----
Precision=8 bits
Destination ID=1 (Chrominance)
DQT, Row #0: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #2: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #3: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #4: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #5: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #6: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #7: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approx quality factor = 100.00 (scaling=1.54 variance=1.58)

does say ASSESSMENT: Image is very likely processed/edited at the bottom though.

whitebalance came from k770
seq_set_prop_1_0 = #WR_REG(14, 80) //Auto WB

also from k770 to prove 80 means off

//**************************************************
// Digital Sharpening, property 21
//
// 0 => Off 1 => +1 1 => +2 1 => +3
// 4 => +4 5 => +5 6 => Auto
//**************************************************
seq_set_prop_15_0 = #WR_REG(21, 80);
seq_set_prop_15_1 = #WR_REG(21, 00);
seq_set_prop_15_2 = #WR_REG(21, 01);
seq_set_prop_15_3 = #WR_REG(21, 02);
seq_set_prop_15_4 = #WR_REG(21, 03);
seq_set_prop_15_5 = #WR_REG(21, 04);
seq_set_prop_15_6 = #WR_REG(21, 40);

@jomateixa you say i don't have the knowledge, look at the colour saturation in your driver it doesn't work at least i can do something as simple as working colour saturation. i was the first to use colour saturation in the k800i, first driver with working colour satuaraton was my 2.86 at least i archieved something new and useful i am not always right maybe i'm not right about the jpeg compression but i stand by my whitebalance off.
--
Posted: 2008-03-02 19:32:07
Edit : Quote

jomateixa Posts: > 500

AHAHAHAHAHA... So the colour saturation in my driver is not working? LOL and LOL

Actually you're a spammer



[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:46 ]
--
Posted: 2008-03-02 19:38:43
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500


On 2008-03-02 19:38:43, jomateixa wrote:
AHAHAHAHAHA... So the colour saturation in my driver is not working? LOL and LOL

Actually you're a spammer

[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:40 ]


no it's not and yes it is funny

so now you want to start trying to insult me & call me childish names over the internet, how sad i think you need to grow up.
--
Posted: 2008-03-02 19:45:24
Edit : Quote

jomateixa Posts: > 500

Now I understand Raiderski, you're really annoying...You're saying that colour saturation is not working on my driver, twice (LOL). Install it and use it, cuz your driver is PATHETIC
--
Posted: 2008-03-02 19:49:45
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500


On 2008-03-02 19:49:45, jomateixa wrote:
Now I understand Raiderski, you're really annoying...You're saying that colour saturation is not working on my driver, twice (LOL). Install it and use it, cuz your driver is PATHETIC


you think i'm annoying for telling you something twice two months was the first time i told you so did genus, try having some twat with every new camdriver you spend alot of your free time making & testing always finding something negative to say about it then always trying to start a argument with you about it thats annoying.

cuz your driver is PATHETIC
--
Posted: 2008-03-02 19:57:56
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 121314 ... 282930>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home