News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > General > Compare phones and brands ( Previous Title : Why SE is better than Nokia?) Bookmark topic

Anyway, Nokia devices are manufactured with Siemens machines in Komarom, Hungary. At least a friend of mine working there says so. This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2004-05-31 15:10:39
Edit : Quote


@etaab

ut10 (or whatever) vs z1010.
--
Posted: 2004-06-01 09:09:38
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2004-06-01 09:09:38, nickname88cy wrote:
@etaab

ut10 (or whatever) vs z1010.


ut10 ? meaning my T610..

Your point being what ?
--
Posted: 2004-06-01 12:58:00
Edit : Quote


does nickname mean the siemens 3G phone U10. I dont think it was released here in the UK.

http://www.phoneyworld.com/handsets/phone.aspx?phone=siemens_u10

nearly as gd as z1010 but for the screen and size of it.
theres this which is better but minus the exandable memory:

http://www.phoneyworld.com/handsets/specifications.aspx?phone=siemens_u15

i don't know if or where these phones have been released. theyre quite old but havnt heard much about them in the uk.

EDIT: sorry forgot to add i think z1010 beats both siemens designwise, tho the second one is not bad looking.

[ This Message was edited by: roch on 2004-06-01 16:34 ]
--
Posted: 2004-06-01 17:28:06
Edit : Quote


how about the SX1 on seimens side. Out b4 the k700 with radio and sd-card slot. shame about the sh*t design...obvious taking design tips from nokia...very bad move IMO!

http://www.phoneyworld.com/ha[....]cations.aspx?phone=siemens_sx1

Siemens is catching up!!
--
Posted: 2004-06-01 17:40:20
Edit : Quote


The SX1 is the same phone pretty much as the 6600. Nokia beat them to it.

Isnt that U10 the same phone as the NEC e313, they're almost identical, and as ugly as each other !
--
Posted: 2004-06-01 23:15:58
Edit : Quote


Still both came out before SE puts out anything which can compete. Isnt ur point that siemens is slow to release handsets with up to date technologies? So Siemens cant be that slow....well at least not as slow as SE on some things! Siemens also has a 1.3Mp camera phone lined up just like every other phone manufacturer. Theyre not as popular as SE, Nokia, Samsung and Moto but technology wise i think they've pretty much caught up with the crowd. Havnt converted to clamshell yet tho...not sure about the Xelibri (or however u spell it) section.
--
Posted: 2004-06-01 23:47:10
Edit : Quote


Actually they are further behind. AFAIK SE never intended to release a Series 60 based handset to compete with the 6600 or SX1. Instead SE have the P900, which rivals both and is better at what it does.

Theres no point in SE releasing a Series 60 based smartphone, as it would rival their own UIQ handset.

All three are smartphones, and theres no doubt the P900 wins in terms of functionality. So, the SX1 being the latest phone out does show how far behind Siemens are.

Its not that Siemens are slow at releasing their phones, they are slower to adopt new technology. In comparison, SE arent slow in using new technology, but they do take far too long to release new handsets after they are announced.
--
Posted: 2004-06-02 00:28:50
Edit : Quote


Doesnt the Siemens SX65 count as a smart phone? Dont ask me how it stacks up against the P series tho...im not familiar with P series specs...i kno that the SX65 is the same as the 02 XDA- and runs Windows Pocket PC Phone. No camera but its quite old and i dont know whether theres a follow up.

Dont the 6600 and sx1 target different markets than the P series. P series being more PDA like and larger. So siemens chose the small symbian smart phone and the very PDA like SX65, SE took the middle ground.

[ This Message was edited by: roch on 2004-06-02 01:06 ]
--
Posted: 2004-06-02 02:02:57
Edit : Quote


IMHO, SE phones are more durable, have a more stable system and have higher resale value, and a little more expensive than their Nokia counterparts.
--
Posted: 2004-06-02 07:08:40
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index