>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2008
Bookmark topic
On 2008-06-18 12:38:43, bavlondon2 wrote:
If Paris really was running on a new hardware platform do you really think it would be cancelled?
There's not even a shadow of a proof for that.
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:05:10
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-18 13:00:32, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
Not yet, give PK a chance to wake up!
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:05:16
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-18 13:05:10, doministry wrote:
On 2008-06-18 12:38:43, bavlondon2 wrote:
If Paris really was running on a new hardware platform do you really think it would be cancelled?
There's not even a shadow of a proof for that.
That's what I am talking about, no proof but people all around whining (and some celebrating) Paris cancellation as if it was a 100% fact.
[ This Message was edited by: Phoner on 2008-06-18 12:13 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:13:27
Edit :
Quote
Eomer is one of the most to be trusted insiders. Did you read his sentence about Beibei and Paris?
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:15:21
Edit :
Quote
Guess I read it, cause I posted it here
Still I do not find that mysterious sentence to be proof enough to jump to such harsh judgments. It's possible he meant it in different way.
[ This Message was edited by: Phoner on 2008-06-18 12:19 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:18:34
Edit :
Quote
You mean this?
On 2008-06-17 19:31:54, Phoner wrote:
Another post from mobile-review regarding the above:
"Rog is spot on.
Bye bye Beibei too.
More info to come next week"
I meant this:
Motorola didn't cancel all UIQ phones this year, they delayed most of them.
Skarven and derivatives are frozen - but you can pretty much guarantee Skarven is dead. So is Paris and BeiBei from SEMC.
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:22:48
Edit :
Quote
I must say that I'm a little disappointed that the new C series is not UIQ/Symbian. I think it's one of the nicest looking phones SE have released, but I just couldn't do away with UIQ
( Although, I suppose there really isn't any need for a camera focused phone to need UIQ.
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:28:56
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-18 13:22:48, xell wrote:
You mean this?
On 2008-06-17 19:31:54, Phoner wrote:
Another post from mobile-review regarding the above:
"Rog is spot on.
Bye bye Beibei too.
More info to come next week"
I meant this:
Motorola didn't cancel all UIQ phones this year, they delayed most of them.
Skarven and derivatives are frozen - but you can pretty much guarantee Skarven is dead. So is Paris and BeiBei from SEMC.
Bingo.
On 2008-06-18 13:28:56, s32bauer wrote:
I must say that I'm a little disappointed that the new C series is not UIQ/Symbian. I think it's one of the nicest looking phones SE have released, but I just couldn't do away with UIQ
( Although, I suppose there really isn't any need for a camera focused phone to need UIQ.
Thats becasue SE cant make any good UIQ devices any more.
[ This Message was edited by: bavlondon2 on 2008-06-18 12:36 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:35:55
Edit :
Quote
So whats wrong with the G900 exactly?
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:51:51
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-18 13:51:51, goldenface wrote:
So whats wrong with the G900 exactly?
I second that.
--
Posted: 2008-06-18 13:58:04
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
