>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Xperia arc discussion Thread
Bookmark topic
To me daylight photos look about the same as x10 so good quality. But night photos look ok ish. One uploaded by Mizzle in photos section was dreadful(sorry mizzle). I am getting Neo already ordered but I have not got it just cos of camera. A good lowlight test will be a street full of lights at night
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2011-03-19 22:30 ]
--
Posted: 2011-03-19 23:29:18
Edit :
Quote
tbf that nokia N8 versus arc test the arc looks like it's running 480p
And I never judge a test unless I get the source files
--
Posted: 2011-03-19 23:34:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-03-19 20:14:00, Ricke77 wrote:
I preordered a blue arc yesterday. They told me it would take almost 2 weeks before I get it. Cant hardly wait!
So in two weeks I have a black SE Satio for sale. You can get it for the price of a meal!
Where have you ordered it from if you don't mind me asking?
--
Posted: 2011-03-19 23:57:53
Edit :
Quote
Telenor Sweden. It used to be Vodafone...
--
Posted: 2011-03-20 07:11:00
Edit :
Quote
So as we can see, Arc's camera isn't a disaster, but Exmor-R is worth nothing. Maybe it's not a bad sensor itself, but v. cheap optics and/or terrible "Sony style" noise reduction?
--
Posted: 2011-03-20 07:43:18
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-03-19 23:24:57, norbi_nw wrote:
http://dailymobile.se/2011/03[....]ia-n8-video-camera-comparison/
Don't know what to say... But i am disappointed in SE (lol again?). That Exmor R is just a HUUUUUUGE gimmick, nothing more. I was only looking at the Arc because i thought it will have a better camera than the rest (Neo and Pro). But seems like it will be the exact same performance on all (i doubt the Pro will be worse than this lol, that would be G900 quality). I admit, the design is extraordinary, the hardware looks good, but sony lost the camera battle a long time ago. I know it wasnt promised as a cameraphone, but it could have been better (if the camera would have been tuned up more).
Sum it up: excellent design, good OS, bad* camera or camera software (don't know exactly which one).
* where bad means worse than Satio, N8, C905 and others. Pity because it has been a while since those phones where launched.
Such things make me think about optimus 2x...
--
Posted: 2011-03-20 18:09:13
Edit :
Quote
you cant really compare the Arc with any of the C-series phones (the focus is not the camera on the arc as it was on the cybershot phones, beein superior with xeion flash and other camera goodies)
--
Posted: 2011-03-20 20:09:32
Edit :
Quote
I have looked at the videos of Arc & Neo both have speedy focus
--
Posted: 2011-03-20 20:10:32
Edit :
Quote
hm. .
expansys.se/sony-ericsson-xperia-x12-arc-android-smartphone-misty-silver-208067/
--
Posted: 2011-03-20 20:54:00
Edit :
Quote
@SKIBBE
But C series are dead already. SE dropped it for the Xperia line. So all that was C series can go into Xperia. Maybe they will add more contrast to the pictures and video and remove that white fog that is always present in the latest SE phones.
We arent in 2008 anymore, i know they can get much more out from the camera driver... I know it wasnt promised to be a camera hit phone, but it's 2011, and technology has evolved alot. And people ARE EXPECTING something when you shout out loud 100x that it will use Exmor R sensor
--
Posted: 2011-03-20 22:27:54
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
