Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
Bookmark topic
All mobile phone pics sucks in 100% is this news for anyone?
My c905 pics also suck in 100% and all phone pics i have seen so far sucks compared to a real cam.
Thats why we dont bother that much of viewing them in 100% because we get so sad when we do that. There are alot of full size pics in the "photos" section to download and magnify. 1024x768 is a quite resonable viewing size i think.
I still think c902 does a really good job in good light conditions but indoors is another story.
--
Posted: 2009-02-27 18:07:15
Edit :
Quote
@plank: thanks for the link. I was researching the site you gave me and alternatives and I ended up going with DaVinci to achieve the same result, and I must say that I'm very delighted in how much better my pictures look! With the latest firmware my pictures were bland-colored and ultra noisy, but with 002 the pictures are much better! Now my fiancé is not yellow when I take her picture with flash on! Now if only it wouldn't be a cloudy day around here and I can get some nice shots off!

Thanks again for your help (even if it was indirect!) With that being said, here's my first contribution to the forum:
My mothers dog-- picture taken in complete darkness w/ flash.
and apparently people poop themselves about posting full size, so I put it in the gallery. You can view it
HERE
Hopefully this weather clears up and i can get out and about taking more pictures! I'll be sure to post them here if I do.
Also, I have a comparison picture i'm going to try to take here in a few minutes from the old firmware to the new to see how much of a difference there really is between the two.
--
Posted: 2009-02-27 18:51:10
Edit :
Quote
Here are a couple more I took today. It's still quite a bit cloudy out so I couldn't get picture-perfect photos, but considering that fact I'm EXTREMELY pleased with how they turned out. Again, thank you so much for your help, plank-- before I was regretting buying c902, but now it's been well worth it!
Just a weed I seen growing
A rusty screw on the air conditioning unit
My neighbors dog. I didn't expect it to focus right, especially considering there was fence in the way.. but I thought it came out okay.
You can view the full size on my flickr set
HERE
--
Posted: 2009-02-27 21:27:55
Edit :
Quote
(im glad i could help you)
also remember that R3BA035 is also VERY good. (havnt tried it myself but Muhammad-Olis pics is just damn cruel, so it must be great)
2 tips.
(if its really sunny, stand in the shadow instead directley in the sun, then point at a sunny object, voila, thicker colours and better contrast.
tilt your camera (phone) downwards a bit, (proper angle gives better colours)
here i kept the phone more darker. gives better colours.

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-02-27 22:43 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-27 22:15:09
Edit :
Quote
Pink Floyd Animals (1977) album cover ? (Battersea Power Station in London). quite close i think
a indoor snap from my daughter birthday party today. (she's a big girl now, 7

)
C 2+

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-02-28 19:37 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-28 20:02:51
Edit :
Quote
((one of the best c902 picture ive seen)). cheers to dreiv

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-03 10:00 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-02 18:12:57
Edit :
Quote
favo photo object, (think i have shot this Building hundred of times

)
found a older K810 picture shot at the same object (slightly different view though, so its hard to compare exactly, anyway both pictures is original of course). quite Big difference i must say.
c902..... iso-64. exposure 1/2500
k810..... iso-80. exposure 1/1000

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-03 10:23 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-03 10:55:10
Edit :
Quote
Amazing locking house that one.
Yes the c902 looks much better but you also have exposure set to -0,7 but 0 on the k810i picture. and the shades falls completely different so itīs hard to compare those shots..
Small changes to levels of the k810i pic and then it looks like this.
c902 are better ofcourse but hard to compare this way.
--
Posted: 2009-03-03 11:45:45
Edit :
Quote
he he. if I should use photo DJ or photo shop on that c902 picture the color saturation had become just mad. (besides, think it became way to yellow after your editing

)
(not to be forgotten, both pictures is 100% original)
yes, of course its hard to compare. (thats why i wrote the exposure and iso settings + remind everyone its different views, etc).
Pitzon, i miss your splendid c902 pics, think they was(is) absolutely great

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-03 12:04 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-03 12:30:12
Edit :
Quote
Yes i know but the Ev value effects the photo very much thats just why i thought it should be mentioned

The editing is way to yellow i know but i just did a quickie in 2 seconds.
Well i have both c902 and c905 and actually i most often have the c905 in my pocket. So i havenīt used the c902 that much lately
--
Posted: 2009-03-03 12:51:33
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply