News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 Bookmark topic

gosh.. i just can't understand.. im the one who took those picture.. and you the one who swaping those picture just to prove that 5.6C are the best? that's phetatic... please.. wear your spectacle or maybe use a Magnifier if you don't have one..

Quote:
On 2006-09-09 06:09:11, QuickShare™ wrote:
ok here's the comparisson between 2.4 Hybrid and 5.6C Camdriver..

5.6C Camdriver


2.4 Hybrid Camdriver



its damn clear picture above 5.6C Camdriver comes first and 2.4Hybrid Camdriver on the second one..

_________________
My K750i Flickr Site..
Flickr.com

[ This Message was edited by: QuickShare™ on 2006-09-09 06:04 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-09 06:58:22
Edit : Quote


What are you talking about swapping? I'm confussed this topic is about camdrivers and what is better what does what. and from my KNOWLEDGE!!!! based on graphic editing.. yes I showed you simply how your opinion that 2.4 was sharper thats all. no need to get hyped!

I just like prooving people wrong! and I didnt swap anything apart from when you informed that the photos were in the wrong order.. because that wasnt important, what was important to me is that people should have noticed that the 5.6 driver was clearer, and if they cant then I am sure they are either not used to making comparisons between images or theyre using an LCD or TFT monitor instead of a CRT
--
Posted: 2006-09-09 07:04:16
Edit : Quote


just do more comparison pictures with these two drivers then we can conclude. peace...
--
Posted: 2006-09-09 07:05:36
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-09-09 06:41:12, ilabstudios wrote:
:Swhy would you swap them?? so your saying that 2.4 was more sharper than 5.6 :S

I was justing using the photos you gathered and blowing them up to focus in on a section so you could see the difference in sharpness!

If you cant see that 5.6 is clearly sharper and more vibrant in colour then I dont know why I'm on this forum :S:S


you dare enough to say you didn't mention anything about swaping?
--
Posted: 2006-09-09 07:06:42
Edit : Quote


Quickshare?? who eva u are or whateva ur name is?? ok.. "mate". I dont understand what u meant by swapping.. when you posted that I saved the top and bottom image I did not save 2.4 and then reposted it as 5.6 otherwise what would be the point??

When I made my comparision I put the 2.4 above the 5.6 because i didnt think it would make a difference as if you would bother reading what i wrote I specifically said, "notice how in the 5.6 version it photographed more of the detail but the 2.4 didn't and left the roof slightly blured with less detail". So whether or not the order of the images come in it makes no difference :S:S anyone would no that!! I told you on there which 1 is which...

to make my mood even happier here you go again round 3:

2.4 once again (less sharp and blurry)


5.6 which an old person could see is sharper.. all you need to do is look at the edges!!!


--
Posted: 2006-09-09 07:18:10
Edit : Quote


dude, its pretty obvious the 2.4 pic in that comparison is much sharper and clearer. ive showed it to a handful of people here and they all say the same thing. and im using crt monitor btw. sometimes proving people wrong doesnt make you right
--
Posted: 2006-09-09 07:20:22
Edit : Quote


well mate.. anything that can make you satisfied
--
Posted: 2006-09-09 07:22:05
Edit : Quote


I'm seriously seriously seriously VERY confussed as to whether or not you people know what Sharp means??? and how one may spot if an object is sharper than another!

Having clear form and detail: a sharp photographic image.

I do not understand how you lot can say the image Quickshare posted (2.4) version was clearer and "sharper".. I will not clarify anymore as I know I'm talking with probablly adults who know nothing about this type of stuff and are to stubborn to learn or children who are neive and also to stubborn to take in information!!

If you really wanted me to I could elaborate more in TECHNICAL terms and go deeper into why the 5.6 driver is the best. but i dont have the energy as its 6.28am and I haven't gone to bed yet...

Toodle Loo!!
--
Posted: 2006-09-09 07:29:20
Edit : Quote


Try reading this clever cloggs! http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/sharpness.htm

Sorry to go off topic..
--
Posted: 2006-09-09 07:37:35
Edit : Quote


Just want to join the row . I agree with Quickshare that 2.4 gives SHARPER image. Ilabstudios, calm down and take a look at the original pictures from Quickshare. Just take a look at the lower left hand corner where there are some palm trees (or something like that). Take a look at the needle leaves. That clearly shows that the 2.4 picture is MUCH sharper than 5.6c.

I don't want to join any philosophical question of what constitutes sharpness. My eyes simply tell me which one is sharper.
--
Posted: 2006-09-09 07:40:45
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Topic Locked

Forum Index