>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K800 vs C902 pictures please
Bookmark topic
Thanks. but I'm looking for more of pictures not with ideal conditions like posted above. The background is still bright enough to magnify the flash. I hope I can see some pictures with the criteria I posted in my earlier posts and see how the c902 fares in that aspect..
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 14:26:27
Edit :
Quote
@plank, Why are you belaboring this point? K800 and c905 have much better flash no matter how much you disparage my flash use capabilities.
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 17:08:18
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-11-09 14:13:19, plankgatan wrote:
edit...if you looking for flash pics taken in big views outdoor...forgett it. thats not even possible for c905/k850....cellphones flashes is for most (if you want good quality) indoor 0-3m, (or outdoor close up/portrait pics),
The C905 has the best flash on all camphones today. Look at the
samples PhoneArena posted in their review. The so called "Photo Flash" on the C902 (it's still LED flash, no matter how much SE marketing try to fool people by giving it a new fancy name) is only good for scenes close enough to touch with your hand, like your cat photo.
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 18:28:29
Edit :
Quote
Bialynia..........again, you talk about stuff i havnt said....if you READ what i write, im talking about LED vs Photo flash...i havnt said one thing that Photo flash should be better then Xenon....
---------------------------------------------------------
besides... i havnt said c905 have a bad flash...i just said for the moment K850 produce sharper & more vivid flash pictures then c905.
so back to topic..........
if you cant live whitout real Xenon flash...buy k800....... otherwise buy C902, it a bit better on everything.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
edit...Abu...whats the problem with this ?? quote: "cellphones flashes is for most
(if you want good quality) indoor 0-3m, (or outdoor close up/portrait pics)".......its very correct !
(and if its 0-3m, 0-3.4m or 0-4m who cares, thats no the point)...the truth is that cellphone xenon flashes works bad outdoor on bigger scenes, (i have own 3st different cellphones with xenon, so i know for sure)
_________________
I

C902,

W810 &

T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-09 18:27 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 19:02:17
Edit :
Quote
...the truth is that cellphone xenon flashes works bad outdoor on bigger scenes, (i have own 3st different cellphones with xenon, so i know for sure)
No flash works well for objects that are far away on any camera, but on regular outdoor scenes the c905's flash is great.
I have no idea what you're talking about Plank, my outdoor flash pics have been AMAZING thus far, I have been so pleasantly surprised, I simply couldn't take these same pics with the c902.
[ This Message was edited by: Bialynia on 2008-11-09 18:36 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 19:35:43
Edit :
Quote
what did i just write ?????
"outdoor for portrait or close up pictures".......and thats exactley what you just posted....and no, this are NOT AMAZING like you say... (they are good for outdoor, but surely not amazing).
go out in the dark and snap a flash pictures on the street...then post it, (then you understand what im talking about).. c905 have the best cellphone flash on the market right now, but it have some kind of software issues.
this is great flash quality in my eyes...k850
_________________
I

C902,

W810 &

T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-09 23:50 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 19:46:55
Edit :
Quote
plankis,
I didn't care the way how you lumped the C905 together with such an inferior camphone as the K850. And the usable range for the C905 is beyond the range you gave: 0-3m. As you can see in PhoneArena's samples, their shots were at a distance of 4 meters, and the picture quality was still pretty good. Name one other camera phone with such an impressive flash.
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 19:52:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-11-09 19:46:55, plankgatan wrote:
what did i just write ?????
"outdoor for portrait or close up pictures".......and thats exactley what you just posted....and no, this are NOT AMAZING like you say... (they are good for outdoor, but surely not amazing).
go out in the dark and snap a flash pictures on the street...then post it, (then you understand what im talking about).. its the best cellphone flash on the market right now, BUT IT HAVE SOFTWARE ISSUES. it often dosent get really sharp.
Plank, I won't argue with you since now you're just being silly, and I repeat, THERE IS NO PROBLEM WITH THE FIRMWARE no matter how often your repeat it.
[ This Message was edited by: Bialynia on 2008-11-09 19:12 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 20:11:10
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-11-09 20:11:10, Bialynia wrote:
Plank, I won't argue with you since now you're just being silly, and I repeat, THERE IS NO PROBLEM WITH THE FIRMWARE no matter how often your repeat it.
That's plankis' FUD campaign against the C905.
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 20:16:45
Edit :
Quote
That's what I've been looking for, flash pictures taken by the c902 in dark outdoor environment. You mean to say that the c902 is limited in taking great regular dark outdoor pictures?
--
Posted: 2008-11-09 23:40:19
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply