Who tells you the X10 will support DLNA?
I only agree with the fact that Motorola droid camera SUCKS (the Iphone camera is doing a better job).

Well unlike screen resolutions which is different everywhere, all spec sheats actually say capacitive screen. Cant be a misstake

Which spec sheets? There is nothing in the white paper or anywhere else from about screen type. If I missed where it says capacitive please link it!
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 15:09:00
Edit : Quote


Wow!

In a day's time, this thread has turned into one hell of a whine-a-thon with a few posts showing logic and wisdom. As usual, people have taken their own personal mind-cooked fantasy spec-lists to the heart and have found reasons to complain about a seemingly unhateable product. Good job!

I'm just gonna sit out on this madness and post when sense prevails. And to laugh in the face of certain folks when the X10 eventually gets Android 2.0.

No offense.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 15:13:28
Edit : Quote



I say so. But if you don't believe me, then have a look at what Engadget has to say:
"There you'll find the full XPERIA X10 announcement details and spec sheet, which is highlighted by a 4-inch capacitive display and a deeply customized user interface."
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 15:17:53
Edit : Quote


I hope you don't mind if I borrow you some money when I decide to buy it :



Sony Ericsson should make official whether it is capacitive or what
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 15:25:32
Edit : Quote


SnoFlake,

SE is not 1/2 Android manufacturers:
SE, HTC, Motorola, Acer, Samsung, etc.

Saka,
Thank you for posting the REAL question of the screen: Capacitive or Resistive (or something new)??

NightBlade,
I'm hoping you're right - but nothing in the White Paper says Capacitive [http://se-blog.com/ says it is, but I want to see it from directly] I know SE makes a lot of spec mistakes but no manufacturer is worse than Nokia in this regards.

In the White Paper I found this which is odd:
* HTML Email - Yes(Read only) p13 ??
- does this mean I can read html emails but not compose them? Will emails with photos/videos/recordings be attachments not inline?
* HTML 5 (partial support):Browser support
* Adobe Flash is not supported (p.16)
- Now a LOT of people are going to freak out regarding Flash. I for one am VERY happy! If any of you have seen GoogleWave, you'll know its for the better in the long run. iPhone also has HTML 5 support so the web will begin to cater to these mobile devices more efficiently. I'm VERY curious how this will work with HTML emails??

@OfflineR,
DLNA is mentioned in the White Paper
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 15:29:54
Edit : Quote


It is capacitive guys. Mattias Holm said so. He is a global product PR manager at Sony Ericsson!
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 15:31:10
Edit : Quote


I was hopeful for this one, but it really does sound typical of SE already - months away from release (missing Christmas), current hardware in a very poor state, already in need of a big OS update that's far from guaranteed, and almost certain to be considerably less relevant to everyone here by the time it's eventually in the shops.

SE (and the few of its fans still here) still seem to believe that all they have to do to guarantee sales is announce a product, and then just wait for the money to roll in six months later when it's actually on sale - but it just doesn't work that way anymore. This isn't the P800 - a groundbreaking device that went months past deadline but was still unique when it launched - this is Just Another Android Phone, in the same way that the X1 (and now X2) was just another Windows phone, and the Satio just another S60 Touch device - all of these products had plenty of very healthy competition before they were even announced, let alone the many months later when each actually released, by which point - in each case - their specs and design are all significantly less unique or special.

It's easy to announce hardware like this - if everyone else planning a competing device for Q1 2010 had called a press conference yesterday, there'd be a lot less to say about the X10 right now.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 15:33:11
Edit : Quote


I think there is no need to wait for this phone till spring 2010..
Sonyericsson was preparing this phone for one year and still as we see is on a very early stage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ytEOOTGtIo
Further more tha lack of multitouch and the 16000 colors make a very bad impression to people (and i'm not reffering to a couple of se-fans here) and there is no excuse for that since there is a 1Ghz cpu inside X10.

Plus no android 2.0 and 8gb of memory make it not better than other phones ALREADY on market... and we have at least 4 months yet to go...missing Christmas!

(i didn't hear any word for the speakers... .)

--
Posted: 2009-11-03 15:34:15
Edit : Quote


And to everyone beating SeaLover down on the resolution, that's mean. We all LOVE this design's so his eyes may be strained more than the common phone user.

That said I can see where he's coming from.
Just case SE C905 has 262,144 Colour TFT screen that looks fabulous remember this is on a 2.3-2.4" screen. Not a 4" screen. Also note its using a much smaller resolution: QVGA, and NOT WVGA!

So how will colours look on a 4" screen, using resolution: 480x854, and 262,144 Colours?
That GPU will be under-utilized to really show off its potential. What of shaders, gradients, etc that is the hallmark of mobile games lately? IMO 262,144 Colours is great for a 2.2-2.4" QVGA resolution screen for J2ME games. But for a smartphone with such a highly spec'd CPU with hardware video acceleration, hmm. Maybe has something down the pipe in Q1 2010.

PS: Oh and for those that have a bad taste of Symbian in their mouth on Satio ... don't worry Symbian-Foundation is working on better UI - I'll post a Youtube video of a user proposal that was featured @ SEE 2009 in the Satio thread.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 15:37:07
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply