General discussions : General : Compare phones and brands ( Previous Title : Why SE is better than Nokia?)
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> Compare phones and brands ( Previous Title : Why SE is better than Nokia?)
Bookmark topic
In terms of durability, SE is much better. Basically nokia makes only fancy looking phones.
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-06-02 09:07:14
Edit :
Quote
what about the newcomer sx2.it is said that it will be the best. they are some pics at club-siemens
--
Posted: 2004-06-02 16:02:34
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-06-02 02:02:57, roch wrote:
Doesnt the Siemens SX65 count as a smart phone? Dont ask me how it stacks up against the P series tho...im not familiar with P series specs...i kno that the SX65 is the same as the 02 XDA- and runs Windows Pocket PC Phone. No camera but its quite old and i dont know whether theres a follow up.
Dont the 6600 and sx1 target different markets than the P series. P series being more PDA like and larger. So siemens chose the small symbian smart phone and the very PDA like SX65, SE took the middle ground.
[ This Message was edited by: roch on 2004-06-02 01:06 ]
SE develop their own products, not simply stick their logo on something another company made..
The SX65 is the exact same phone as the original XDA. Both the XDA and XDAII (MDAII, Q-Tek and many other names) are made by Taiwanese company HTC. So, it doesnt count as Siemens didnt develop and manufacture the technology themselves, they simply used another companies product and stuck their label on it.
Both the SX1 and 6600 target the business market as does the P900. However, the special bit to remember concerning the SX1 and 6600 is that they are also targetted at the common user. All three however are classed as smartphones, with the SX1 being the last out of the starting blocks.. again.
As for the SX2.. or SX45 as its known over here - who cares ? Its obviously aimed at the same high-end business market that the XDAII is aimed at, yet look at the specs (taken from my-siemens):
RAM: SX45 (32mb) XDAII (128mb)
CPU: SX45 (150mhz) XDAII (400mhz)
Freq: SX45 (dualband) XDAII (Triband)
GPRS: SX45 (no) XDAII (yes)
Looks like its behind.. again !
Go Siemens !
_________________
Baby if you give it to me, i'll give it to you, i know what you want, you know i got it...
[ This Message was edited by: etaab on 2004-06-02 17:30 ]
--
Posted: 2004-06-02 18:30:17
Edit :
Quote
hello there.. i just wanted to tell u guys.. i had nokia before and i didnt like it... menus are terrible, agenda will only work with one number per contact.. so if u have 4 different numbers for your dad u will have to make for entries for your dad....
now im pretty happy with my t616 which has bunch of features on it....
the other thing is that ive beeen checking the nokia 3600 and so far i think is kind cool.... can anyone tell me if it is worth to switch from my SE to that one?
--
Posted: 2004-06-02 18:40:09
Edit :
Quote
To all Posters : The Title Has Changed. Now its more general about comparing phones, and not only se and nokia.
--
Posted: 2004-06-03 09:23:29
Edit :
Quote
Maybe you should change it to ' Comparing brands, and why SE is better than ALL the others ! '
pfft ! Siemens !
--
Posted: 2004-06-03 12:33:06
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-05-25 16:32:21, etaab wrote:
...( they dont smash open each time you drop them ) better Bluetooth support, innovation, better reception, less common, better logo, better technology ( Nokia are always behind ), not as greedy as Nokia, better smartphones, better budget phones, more features..
and SE phones arent boring ! Nokias are !
Nokia dont make bad phones, but they dont exactly get me excited each time they release a ' new ' phone every 28 days.
(About this dumb early post, in case someone hasn't already mentioned) Well duh!!! Thats cuz most Nokia mobiles let you change the covers, instead of sticking too a boring 'silver' colour! SE are boring cuz you can't change the covers or add flashing keypads etc! Contradicting yourself...
Also, i dunt think you'll ever be able to buy a Sony Ericsson for £99 with a built-in-camera, radio, MMS, X-HTML, flashlight, CHANGEABLE COVERS!, HSCSD, EDGE etc. (hint hint, Nokia's have better budget phones, the only SE budget phones i can think of is the T230 and the Z200!)
But i do agree with your last thought... 'Nokia dont make bad phones'.
[ This Message was edited by: coo1k3n on 2004-06-03 14:07 ]
--
Posted: 2004-06-03 14:56:20
Edit :
Quote
so, what two phones will fight?
)))
--
Posted: 2004-06-03 16:38:23
Edit :
Quote
@ coo1k3n..
Nobody mentioned it because everyone (except you) must have thought it was a valid post
--
Posted: 2004-06-03 16:50:32
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
(About this dumb early post, in case someone hasn't already mentioned) Well duh!!! Thats cuz most Nokia mobiles let you change the covers, instead of sticking too a boring 'silver' colour! SE are boring cuz you can't change the covers or add flashing keypads etc! Contradicting yourself...
Also, i dunt think you'll ever be able to buy a Sony Ericsson for £99 with a built-in-camera, radio, MMS, X-HTML, flashlight, CHANGEABLE COVERS!, HSCSD, EDGE etc. (hint hint, Nokia's have better budget phones, the only SE budget phones i can think of is the T230 and the Z200!)
But i do agree with your last thought... 'Nokia dont make bad phones'.
WOW! Changeable covers! I so want a Nokia now, what a cool feature. I can just imagine how jealous everyone will be as I swap my covers about, whilst they are standing there with their well designed, feature packed little SE phones!
Seriously though, there is a very good reason that most Nokia phones come with changeable fascias, it's to try and disguise the fact that just about every Nokia phone looks the same!
_________________
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC
[ This Message was edited by: scotsboyuk on 2004-06-03 15:58 ]
--
Posted: 2004-06-03 16:56:45
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
