Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
Bookmark topic
I think some of them are fake pictues as I myself using C902 just bought few days back and updated to R3d and the images are so dissopinting..Belive me even in day light there is noise on darker parts of the photo and even the snaps are all over sharp which looks very horrible when u see it full screen....I will soon upload the real pics taken from c902..
But even agree that the new firmware pics are better then the older whhich is R3E and I feel the noise has reduced in the firmware , though the snaps are not upto my expectations...
Soory no offence to any1 or not trying to hurt anybodys feeling...coz from your pics someone whould simply buy the wrong phone like me.... Evevn I saw some of the pics on esato and was impressed and ended up wasting my money on C902...New buyers plz dont come under the impression from pics uploaded on 1 site ..Try searching other sites as well and conclude from all the sites...
[ This Message was edited by: djsquare on 2009-03-19 13:28 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 14:25:39
Edit :
Quote
i can insure you, that (at least) mine pics is 100% original. (and im pretty sure most everyone else is to)
2 tips.
IF you using some kind of 3rd software, you see it right away on the exif data. (it says ACD, Adobe photo shop, etc. instead of R3EA037)
IF you use photo DJ the picture grows directly to ~2 MB in size.....
a 100% original c902 (1944 x 2592) picture is around ~1.3 MB in size....
some other tips is:
proper light and proper angle..... (this tips is for free my man
)
if thats not works, replace your c902, this camera should blow you away in good weather...thats for sure
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-19 16:42 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 15:34:04
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-03-19 14:25:39, djsquare wrote:
New buyers plz dont come under the impression from pics uploaded on 1 site ..Try searching other sites as well and conclude from all the sites...
[ This Message was edited by: djsquare on 2009-03-19 13:28 ]
Can you put the links to those sites to compare please?
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 15:47:16
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-03-19 14:25:39, djsquare wrote:
I think some of them are fake pictues as I myself using C902 just bought few days back and updated to R3d and the images are so dissopinting..Belive me even in day light there is noise on darker parts of the photo and even the snaps are all over sharp which looks very horrible when u see it full screen
You are not supposed to look at CMOS camphone shots at full size.
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 15:58:35
Edit :
Quote
thats not really true ABU.
a good balanced and right optimized firmware do BIG changes......(think its superb full size quality right now)
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c902
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c902
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c902
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c902
(besides, there is many cmos camera with awesome quality. Canon EOS, etc, etc)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
djsquare...................
lower your EV is also a good tip, if you have very bright weather.
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-19 16:47 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 17:11:04
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-03-19 14:02:19, plankgatan wrote:
welcome back Borg
I mean welcome back to your K902....(yeh, i think SE should kept "K" as Kamera. (the "C" looks unstylish)
try some macro with this latest firmware, its really something
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-19 13:07 ]
Thanks
I have to start taking pics again
I agree with the "K" also
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 17:35:50
Edit :
Quote
Still quite noisy to me. Looks better scaled down.
(besides, there is many cmos camera with awesome quality. Canon EOS, etc, etc)
I wasn't talking about cameras. I said CMOS
camphone.
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 17:43:18
Edit :
Quote
edit...............
first of all.. every pictures looks better scaled down. (even my girlfriend Hasselblad camera
Noise is slightly more in c902/k800 yes, BUT its not that much.
besides, if you
compare c902/k800 cmos sensor against i-mobile902 CCD sensor, their colours and details is way better.
(so cmos have some advantages yes ?)
if you think this have to much noise, i guess you are blind. its barley NO noise in this lowlight shot.
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=18353[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-19 17:30 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 18:00:22
Edit :
Quote
Update: plankis was quick to edit his first (honest?) reply...
This talk started with djsquare complaining that full size photos look bad. Shall I post a crop of your photo where there are plenty of noise? Where there is less noise is where the noise reduction has removed it - together with some detail.
besides, if you compare c902/k800 cmos sensor against i-mobile902 CCD sensor, their colours and details is way better.
(so cmos have some advantages yes ?)
Better colors, yes, I can agree with that, but definitely not better details.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2009-03-19 17:36 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 18:30:44
Edit :
Quote
you silly man. (yeh, i read what you sad)
take a look again...... the picture have VERY low noise for such lowlight picture.
(sad you cant admit when everyone else see it)
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=18353
whatever.......
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-19 17:44 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 18:40:35
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
