Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 133134135 ... 493494495>

DonJuan Posts: > 500

lol Plank you know whats funny, doing the face warp on the mannequins
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 09:16:53
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

he he he...seeeeexy
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 10:07:37
Edit : Quote

sadeghi85 Posts: 341


Instead what i'm seeing is some kind of digital compression done by the camera software in order to hide the noise.


what you mean? "bad noise reduction algorithm" or "fuzzy edges caused by lossy jpeg compression"? compression hasn't any effect on hiding the noise.


The way pixels from one part of the image "spill over" into adjacent parts is usually from poor camera software, not from a poor sensor. Or perhaps it is the sensor

can you explain more(with pictures)?


[ This Message was edited by: sadeghi85 on 2007-11-30 10:07 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 11:04:52
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

your right the k850i pictures are heavily compressed
this is from the k850i camdriver
50 // JPEG_INIT_QUALITY = 80d 46 // JPEG_FIRST_QUALITY = 70d3C // JPEG_LAST_QUALITY = 60d
so u could end up with a picture compressed at 60% lol even k800i manages 90% =
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 11:19:10
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

as long the pictures ends up good, who cares about some tech info

it take sharp macro, it take sharp portrait, it take sharp indoor & it take sharp flash pics....thats realy ok for me

k850 have one of the best camera on the market.....thats also realy ok for me

________________
I k850i, w810i & T28



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-11-30 13:16 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 11:35:17
Edit : Quote

Bhavv Posts: > 500

Took some pics of my PC for another forum with my K850i. I havn't rezized them, so will post thumbnails:


With Flash:



http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/2428/dsc00022fd6.jpg



http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/8783/dsc00023uo2.jpg

Dark Pics:



http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/5295/dsc00022abd3.jpg



http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/4047/dsc00024bu5.jpg



http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/322/dsc00025ba3.jpg

[ This Message was edited by: Bhavv on 2007-11-30 14:35 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Bhavv on 2007-11-30 15:48 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 15:34:36
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500


On 2007-11-30 04:17:42, Radiux399 wrote:
However, noise (as in low light noise) isn't what i'm really concerned with. Instead what i'm seeing is some kind of digital compression done by the camera software in order to hide the noise. The way pixels from one part of the image "spill over" into adjacent parts is usually from poor camera software, not from a poor sensor. Or perhaps it is the sensor. Either way, the one on the T650i is much smaller, and yet still manages to do a much better job.

Probably not compression but noise reduction and maybe not enough sharpening. But reducing noise in a JPEG also has the effect of making it smaller after compression. With the average size of K850 photos being about 1 - 1.5 MB (correct me if this is wrong!) then this corresponds to about 15 percent compression when using the JPEG optimizer in PSP, and this level of compression usually leaves no visible artifacts.

All image sensors have a fuzzy filter to minimize moire and other pixelation effects in photos and require sharpening after acquiring the image from the sensor. On more expensive digicams that support the RAW image format you collect the image as-is, without sharpening and other processing applied.
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 16:42:47
Edit : Quote

Bhavv Posts: > 500

Some more pics of my uber geekyness +100 things:



http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/9895/dsc00036sh0.jpg



http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/698/dsc00039pl2.jpg

I my dragon.

I just realised that thumbnails dont seem to work here, I'll add links to the full images after each pic.

[ This Message was edited by: Bhavv on 2007-11-30 15:46 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Bhavv on 2007-11-30 15:47 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 16:44:46
Edit : Quote

DonJuan Posts: > 500

So if the K850 software is compressing the images at the moment. Does this mean with better software we can expect clearer and sharper pictures in the future??
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 18:36:37
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500


On 2007-11-30 18:36:37, DonJuan wrote:
So if the K850 software is compressing the images at the moment. Does this mean with better software we can expect clearer and sharper pictures in the future??


of course...its so with all digital cameras, cell phones, graphics card, etc... (everything who use a GPU)....
you more optimized software, you better result.....

_________________
I k850i, w810i & T28





[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-11-30 18:15 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-30 19:11:37
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 133134135 ... 493494495>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home