Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
Bookmark topic
Everyone else?
Are we talking about this photo?
Looks better at your favorite 1:3 scale doesn't it?
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2009-03-19 17:55 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 18:47:35
Edit :
Quote
there is small amount of noise only because of direct light fro lights to sensor, everything is underexposed
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 19:03:17
Edit :
Quote
Plank
what camera version number R3EA037 have?
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 19:28:00
Edit :
Quote
its HUGE improvement on the quality, noise have been reduced very good and colours is still VERY vibrant and clear....(everyone who HAVE c902 knows it)
and please, indoor with i-mobile902 CCD is no beauty. (first of all i havent seen many pics taken over iso.50 with i-mobile902...why ????
(well i know, it looks crap), its nothing hard to get sharp lowlight pics in iso.50, just hold your camera damn still and there you go.
indoor CCD (i-mobile902)..think we can stop nagging that cmos looks little noisy in full size...this looks worse.
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=samart&model=i-mobile+902
100% crop...iso.50 (as usual
(yeh, i know its a old phone), but please, stop saying cmos is worse then this ccd-crap......when it comes a CCD cellphone who is near SE colours and everything, THEN say - "this cmos is really behind"...until then, zip it.
@Raederski, i can look it up...i get back to you with the information
--------------------------------------------------------
(really strange, i change EV, but it says the same ?) still darker and lighter)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-19 21:41 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 21:33:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-03-19 21:33:06, plankgatan wrote:
and please, indoor with i-mobile902 CCD is no beauty. (first of all i havent seen many pics taken over iso.50 with i-mobile902...why ????
(well, i know, it looks crap), thats why we always see all night pics taken in iso.50...its CCD sensor destroy everything over iso.200-300). its nothing hard to get sharp night pics in iso.50, just hold your camera damn still and there you go.
How you managed to twist this discussion away from the noise in C902 into i-mobile 902 bashing. Very cunning way of deflecting the topic, huh?
The above photo is a macro shot with the center in focus. You cropped the part where it isn't in focus. The center looks like this:
i-mobile902 CCD sensor produce VERY very DULL picture, (landscape, portait have horrible colours and very weak contrast, etc)
More of the same. Looks like you just copied and pasted one of your old i-mobile 902 bashing posts.
(yeh, i know its a old phone), but please stop compare cmos pics with this ccd-crap
Did I compare? YOU did! You always bring in the i-mobile 902 into any discussion where the topic on noise in C902 come up. First you're defending your camphone showing off some underexposed low light shots claiming these to have little noise. Then when I show you that there is still noise you throw a hissy fit bashing my old phone instead.
Good old plankgatan. He hasn't changed a bit since he last long ban. It's nice to see that some things remain the same in these troubled times.
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 22:34:25
Edit :
Quote
well.
after you said THAT THIS CMOS pictures look to noisy in full size, i just laughed myself.
¤ first because it have low noise, (which most everyone see, except for you and Vipera
).
¤ second, whats the point to nag about cmos sensors, when there is no better sensors around...i dont get it ??
(i-mobile ccd sensor is hardly any better)
besides, this is a picture thread..... no one cares about our crap.
POST c902 pics or get lost
-----------------------------------------------------
well. i take the first step then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-19 22:40 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 22:58:08
Edit :
Quote
Nice flaming going on here, high amusement value, low discussion value as the points one carefully picks are just as easy ignored by the other party It's one of the reasons arguing about these things (especially on forums) is pretty silly and useless.
Seeing this a thread about posting photo's taken with C902 phones talk about other models has no place here and should deemed off topic. If you want to compare just open a new topic and argue in there
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 23:32:43
Edit :
Quote
blerk, nice flaming? man! it's not even worth to make a popcorn and open bottle of beer for more pleasure when reading replies
user rating: 2/10
I remember much tougher discussions, dohh... do we getting older?
--
Posted: 2009-03-19 23:59:39
Edit :
Quote
I'm still new here! But you're telling me there was better stuff? Time to dig in the archives
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 00:07:25
Edit :
Quote
Hey guys chilllll......
Frankly speaking I Know how does it feel when ur own cam doesnt work so well or it doesent stand your expectations. I myself is a very great fan of sony products from mobiles to cam... But sometmes it happens that ssome sony products doesnt seem to stand our expectations which doesnt mean that you still appreciate the bad products or fight for it to proove it.. I just used my c902 today with the latest firmware R3E and im quite satisfied with the new cam drive, and its lot more better then the older firmware althought the cam drive is same as 2.1.
Posting some of the pics as well....
Auto daylight
Auto Indascent
i also needed to ask is it possible by lowering the iso from 100 to 50 will help to reduce more noise????
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 01:17:55
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
