>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Official K800i & K790i discussion
Bookmark topic
the camera takes pics that are perfectly fine... the sharp 903/4 is better but honestly the people that are saying that their k750/w800/w810 are better are on crack
here is an example from the k790 i had vs a w810i
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=916004&page=23&pp=15
the cam isn't fantastic but it is better then the curent SE's out there.
and here are random pics i took with the k790
_________________
Shaolinmonk on HOFO Official PHONE JUNKIE
MyProfile
http://www.howardforums.com/m[....]s=&action=getinfo&userid=20841[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2006-06-26 05:19 ]
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 06:09:27
Edit :
Quote
Some of you guys are expecting a lot from you mobile's camera! I didn't expect a quantam leapt in what the K800 could produce. In the end this is a camera phone ! This is not to say that these pictures aren't bad. If we look upon the principle of having a camera intergrated with our mobile is for convenience. So for those spontaneous moments in which we might want to take a picture. This means that the average user does not need to worry about whether he or she is focusing on the correct area. Two minutes on photoshop with some tinkering with the sharpness and levels gave me a very nice result.
Even if the actual sensor has physical limitations, then SE should at least have some processing after the picture is taken in the phone to make it easier to take those spontaneous shots.
EDIT: A review of the K800!
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_k800-review-93.php
_________________
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood.
Source: Wikipedia[ This Message was edited by: shaliron on 2006-06-26 07:27 ]
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 08:25:43
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-26 05:14:51, Hurst wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-06-25 20:50:47, jack00 wrote:
don't go for camera phones if you need photos with quality
they are getting closer and closer every year, but they are still behind
even a 5mp phone cam wouldn't get you the quality you are searching for
Then what is the purpose of these camera oriented phones? Am I missing something?
Its a gimmick - nothing more nothing less
the photos are nice if you only want to view them on the screen
they are also quite useful if you have an exitent with you car...
trust me, i'm really into photographing and filming - go for a small compact cam
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 08:34:06
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-26 08:34:06, jack00 wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-06-26 05:14:51, Hurst wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-06-25 20:50:47, jack00 wrote:
don't go for camera phones if you need photos with quality
they are getting closer and closer every year, but they are still behind
even a 5mp phone cam wouldn't get you the quality you are searching for
Then what is the purpose of these camera oriented phones? Am I missing something?
Its a gimmick - nothing more nothing less
the photos are nice if you only want to view them on the screen
they are also quite useful if you have an exitent with you car...
trust me, i'm really into photographing and filming - go for a small compact cam
If so, this forum is a brooding ground for commodified fetishim and hedonic adaptation. Cheers
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 09:00:39
Edit :
Quote
My my! The new Cybershot isn't going down well with some members
The dreaded camphone envy syndrome, seems to be rearing its big ugly butt head again, like it does everytime a new model appears
@Dragoneye, I agree with you mate
As far as the new K800 goes the 1.2mp increase wouldn't really make that much difference, like another knowledgeable member, JMCOMMS, was told at a Nokia launch,
......he then went on to explain about the pixels, and the fact that to double the quality of a camera you need to double both X and Y resolution - which means QUADRUPLING the pixels. Therefore to get a serious improvement on 2 megapixel, you jump to 8.
so the jump from 2 - 3.2 is a gimmick, giving us only a slight increase in sharpness over the K750i..
IMO however, the image stabilisation and Bestpic will generally help people take better pics. Sure, they will never by as good as your 6mp dedicated digicam but I think they are printable and good enough for most people.
Those pics Dragoneye took above looks absolutely fine to me, and are excellent for a camphone. T610 takes crap pics, so does the K300, probably only good enough for transferring between phones, but anyone who says the K800 takes rubbish pics not worth printing is nonsensical.
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-06-26 09:11 ]
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 09:37:52
Edit :
Quote
IMO, there's no definite way you can compare the quality of these phones camera -- it ultimately depends on the settings used.
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 09:55:56
Edit :
Quote
The last pics here, are extremly fine!!!
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 10:08:13
Edit :
Quote
well ill be... like the K750s era breakin into mainstream market.... im impressed with K800... just like the way im impressed by K750 back then... ill buy this one definitely!
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 10:42:34
Edit :
Quote
hey rocky? do we have k800 available here yet? balitaan moko ha! thanks
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 11:39:07
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-26 00:50:42, axilom wrote:
Since the K790/K800 is around, it's high time the phone camera thread is bumped. I don't want to start another thread as it's been created already
Mark_Q, we'd all be grateful if you can grace the thread.
You have my respect sir! We're all hoping to learn from you.
axilom,
Thanks for your kind words, they warmed my heart giving strength to go on. Anyhow the short summer here in Finland is blossoming and I'm on vacation trying to limit my time on PC to minimum... you surely understand. But I bookmarked that thread. Later.
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 11:45:38
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
