>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post your Pictures/Videos taken by C905
Bookmark topic
can someone post more low light or night pics taken with the phone ?
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 16:55:36
Edit :
Quote
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
awsome pics marty
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:19:28
Edit :
Quote
much better then before...
c902 have a bit sharper pictures (leafs, trees, grass, etc), but little more noise in full size.....it have a bit stronger post processing i guess.
if you dont print out full size pictures i prefer c902 more sharper pictures, but i also prefer c905 because of its xenon flash and good camera.
(i also think c905 can get little better acording to this flickr.com pictures...but like i said, this last pics is much better so its no hurry)
ps...the first two pics is best....great colors & sharpness.....
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-10-26 18:06 ]
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:55:07
Edit :
Quote
I have seen amazing shots taken by C905, however something tells me that Sony Ericsson are being forced to give worse photo quality than Sony's digital cameras.
I remember when I had my K750i, one of the first firmware produced virtually zero grains in sunny or in cloudy condition.
The later firmwares made the photo quality somewhat worse with more visible noise.
That's probably the reason why Sony are so reluctant to implement video recording capability at VGA resolution.
And of course that's only my speculation.
[ This Message was edited by: McKinley on 2008-10-26 18:12 ]
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 19:11:27
Edit :
Quote
Plank, all you do is criticise my photos and say how much better the C902 is. It's really annoying, as I went out of my way today to get some good daylight pics and upload them for you guys.
How can you say the C902 is better and sharper when you haven't even seen my pics full size?
For once, maybe, just say something nice without mentioning how you think they could be better, or how your phone is still better. Thanks.
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 19:25:55
Edit :
Quote
well i've managed to play with the C905 today and i must say is amazing much better than the N82 and C902....is just great i'll get one at the end of November...can't wait....Marty keep the pictures coming
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 19:56:39
Edit :
Quote
plank, get this once and for all:
The C905's camera is better than C902's in. every. aspect.
Capiche?
BTW, those photos are fantastic!
_________________
Make sure you visit the "
Post your photoshopped wallpapers here!" thread every week or so for graphically-rich goodies!:D
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-10-26 19:01 ]
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 20:00:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-10-26 19:11:27, McKinley wrote:
I have seen amazing shots taken by C905, however something tells me that Sony Ericsson are being forced to give worse photo quality than Sony's digital cameras.
I remember when I had my K750i, one of the first firmware produced virtually zero grains in sunny or in cloudy condition.
The later firmwares made the photo quality somewhat worse with more visible noise.
That's probably the reason why Sony are so reluctant to implement video recording capability at VGA resolution.
And of course that's only my speculation.
[ This Message was edited by: McKinley on 2008-10-26 18:12 ]
Not strange - Sony Ericsson = Ericsson : Sony = 50 : 50. So sony dictates the rulls.
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 20:12:07
Edit :
Quote
100% Crop:
100% Crop:
Remember, the crops show how the picture would look in it's actual size, which is to say:
45 inches by 34 inches, or if you prefer, 115cm by 87cm. That's fantastic detail for a pic that big, taken with a cameraphone.
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 20:14:26
Edit :
Quote
The last pic was nice..
That ugly ...
Nice shots
--
Posted: 2008-10-26 20:36:41
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
