>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Official SE C901 Cybershot discussion
Bookmark topic
I might be blind, but honestley, how can you see that c903 use a sony sensor on that particular picture ?
both pictures is taken in different type of light-surroundings (c901 have brighter background. they not even shoot at the same place, which make it very difficult to compare this crops), it also different distances between this pictures. (c903 is shoot way closer).
i see you are in image analysis, (i assume its private studying like most photo interested people, or am I wrong)
regarding to sonyericsson support, c901 will cost ~300-320 euro.
--
Posted: 2009-02-19 13:26:02
Edit :
Quote
I might be blind, but honestley, how can you see that c903 use a sony sensor on that particular picture ?
because image quality(algorithm) is the same with k850 and c902 and they have sony sensor...
and seems plank is again here, now jaguare
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2009-02-19 13:46 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-19 13:52:12
Edit :
Quote
Yes Vipe I think you're right there.
--
Posted: 2009-02-19 15:32:18
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-18 11:09:06, Mizzle wrote:
The C901 will at least be available in the Nordic countries.
Just in Nordic countries? Is there any chance to be available in Central-Europe too?
--
Posted: 2009-02-19 18:49:36
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-19 18:49:36, puestadelsol wrote:
On 2009-02-18 11:09:06, Mizzle wrote:
The C901 will at least be available in the Nordic countries.
Just in Nordic countries? Is there any chance to be available in Central-Europe too?
I guess both c901 and c903 will be released worldwide, would be strange otherwise.
--
Posted: 2009-02-20 10:51:10
Edit :
Quote
@Vipera ammodytes,
I understood his point at the beginning, I just wondered "how" you guys could see this difference on two pictures taken in two different light surroundings and different distances.
if you compare 2 different images (crops) its very hard to see what type of cam modules they use, IF they are shoot in different surroundings, (especially this type of mid end cameras who have quite blurred crop quality).
--
Posted: 2009-02-20 11:20:43
Edit :
Quote
King9
as I wrote before, it's all about unique charactersitics. light is not important in this case, if you will compare 2 shots from Sony camera but in different light conditions you'll find that noise charactersitic doesn't change much. in daylight shot you don't see noise because it have low magnitude but it's still there, in low light magnitude increasing. Sony technology is quite constant, this is why older models can be very good reference point. I see that something is 'wrong' in pic from C901, it just doesn't fit to Sony. both pics are ISO200, they should have amount of noise near the same level. C903 looks like typical Sony charactersitic but C901 is far from anything I know about Sony cameras. second thing is sharpening processing, once again both pics are different in this matter. Mizzle may dispel any doubts, two similar photos even 100% crops from new C90x models will tell the truth
--
Posted: 2009-02-20 13:22:17
Edit :
Quote
I doubt that jaguare is plank. The guy's English can't improve so much in just a matter of weeks.
--
Posted: 2009-02-20 14:30:57
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-20 14:30:57, gtr83 wrote:
I doubt that jaguare is plank. The guy's English can't improve so much in just a matter of weeks.
translate.google.com ?
--
Posted: 2009-02-20 20:44:50
Edit :
Quote
the name should be the other away around c903 should be with xneon light and c901 should be the normal led.by the way if you check SE gallaries there is no c901 only c903.
--
Posted: 2009-02-20 22:35:42
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
