>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Xperia arc discussion Thread
Bookmark topic
Apperently not. I suppose releases prior honeycomb are only intended for phones while honeycomb and forward will support both phones and tablets.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2011-01-07 15:01 ]
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 15:59:23
Edit :
Quote
Reality Display not too impressive
Read this
GSMArena hands on and some comparison shots with Super Amoled and Iphone4 Retina Display
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_[....]ctures_and_video-news-2204.php
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 16:15:23
Edit :
Quote
The majority of previews I've read think the screen is good, one of the better ones. Does it really have to be the best to be good enough? I think the differences are so small between the screens that it's more subjective than objective which is the best one.
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 16:24:37
Edit :
Quote
you will never get your hands on a phone that is the best in every aspect. as with everything else in life, you will have to take the bad with the good
i think the phone looks beautifull, but i already own the x10 and it will be to expensive to buy this one too
but i would really like to have it
[ This Message was edited by: SKIBBE on 2011-01-07 15:36 ]
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 16:33:19
Edit :
Quote
I dunno why this is confusing everyone. Watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koIzhLaRJJo
...and get an idea of how Honeycomb would the same underlying architecture, but have different UI elements for tablets and phones.
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 16:44:46
Edit :
Quote
The display is brilliant
None of the prototypes have been fully calibrated yet. Some are better than others at this point in time. Or at least, that's what I was told earlier today.
Not too happy about the back cover. It's made of glossy plastic and feels a bit cheap. The phone itself, however, is really great
I've got a short video coming soon.
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2011-01-07 15:51 ]
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 16:48:10
Edit :
Quote
2.4 
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 16:49:06
Edit :
Quote
The 2.4 is maybe what the 2.1 is to the 2.0
[ This Message was edited by: tranced on 2011-01-07 15:55 ]
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 16:53:56
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-01-07 16:48:10, Mizzle wrote:
Not too happy about the back cover. It's made of glossy plastic and feels a bit cheap.
Yeah, I know what you mean. Some metal parts (e.g. the back cover or the frame) would have made the phone a bit more luxury.
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 16:59:32
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-01-07 16:59:32, Arne Anka wrote:
On 2011-01-07 16:48:10, Mizzle wrote:
Not too happy about the back cover. It's made of glossy plastic and feels a bit cheap.
Yeah, I know what you mean. Some metal parts (e.g. the back cover or the frame) would have made the phone a bit more luxury.
Its probably because of costing back plastic is cheaper
but over all it looks good
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 17:06:34
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
