>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> Darvin a NUT?
Bookmark topic
If I was you I'd be very careful about the people who sent you that. The museum they are on about is near Waco, Texas and we all know what happened there don't we. . . :eek:
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2005-07-20 14:27:32
Edit :
Quote
Seems like I was the one who lived to fight another day. . . :grin: BTW what does the bible say about the Neanderthals?
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2005-07-25 00:57:21
Edit :
Quote
it says its shit lol
--
Posted: 2005-07-25 01:03:16
Edit :
Quote
What I am getting at is how can people not accept evolutionary theory when other Humanoids have been proven to have existed?
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2005-07-25 01:20:20
Edit :
Quote
i suppose it would come under the "god created all the creatures of the earth" bit. it's not as if genesis provides an exhaustive list.
--
Posted: 2005-07-25 02:09:51
Edit :
Quote
@gelfen. Does it not say in the Book of Genesis that man was created in the image of God?
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2005-07-25 02:27:21
Edit :
Quote
IMO that's another point not to be taken literally.
--
Posted: 2005-07-25 04:52:27
Edit :
Quote
So what point you have to take literally ? From those who say evolution is bs, I say God is bs cause there not a single evidence while there are plenty for evolution ...
--
Posted: 2005-07-25 09:56:03
Edit :
Quote
well the way i choose to look at it is that in the beginning something had to cause the universe to come into existence.
IMO literal creationism vs. evolution is a no brainer.
--
Posted: 2005-07-26 01:08:45
Edit :
Quote
I Agree. Basically there are 2 theories. The first is that we evolved in Africa and spread out of Africa to replace all previous Hominids. The 2nd is that seperate populations around the globe evolved simultaneously and interbred with each other. Neanderthals did exist at the same time as Modern Humans but are now thought to be not ancestral but did at one time share a common ancestor with us. Interesting.
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2005-07-26 02:46:56
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
