>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Sony Xperia Z2
Bookmark topic
I think it is a little OCD obsessing over reviews & what they think. To real world usage battery tests on reviews are not realistic as they are done in optimal conditions. Saying a website is paid by a manufacturer is just plain daft. If they prefer another brand over another then who cares??
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 22:06:54
Edit :
Quote
@Bonovox
Keep in mind samsung was fined many times for paying websites for positive writings along with microsoft.just google it
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 22:36:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-05-22 22:36:06, josephnero wrote:
@Bonovox
Keep in mind samsung was fined many times for paying websites for positive writings along with microsoft.just google it
Having a hard time finding information on "Samsung being fined many times for paying websites".
Paying for positive reviews, yep. Paying websites, many times? Can't find it. Can you help me?
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 23:27:35
Edit :
Quote
@dalmac
Hardly any difference.Where do that positive reviews get posted?
today phonearena after anandtech and many others proved that Displaymates claim is utter bullshit.take that for example
thats a bit more than positive.it's total lie
[ This Message was edited by: josephnero on 2014-05-22 22:32 ]
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 23:30:43
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-05-22 23:30:43, josephnero wrote:
@dalmac
Hardly any difference.Where do that positive reviews get posted?
today phonearena after anandtech and many others proved that Displaymates claim is utter bullshit.take that for example
thats a bit more than positive.it's total lie
[ This Message was edited by: josephnero on 2014-05-22 22:32 ]
What are you talking about? Have you got any proof that they paid those websites? Didn't Phonearena publish an article stating that Samsung's screen is far from the best? Why would they do that if they were paid by zdamsung
[ This Message was edited by: aussieland1 on 2014-05-22 22:37 ]
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 23:31:51
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-05-22 23:30:43, josephnero wrote:
@dalmac
Hardly any difference.Where do that positive reviews get posted?
today phonearena after anandtech and many others proved that Displaymates claim is utter bullshit.take that for example
thats a bit more than positive.it's total lie
[ This Message was edited by: josephnero on 2014-05-22 22:32 ]
Awful example as Phonearena have mentioned before this that they don't believe its the best display, what they posted today was a thorough explanation on why.
Quit clutching straws.
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 23:35:57
Edit :
Quote
Also about trolls paycheck
http://abcnews.go.com/Technol[....]tcs-products/story?id=20671547
http://www.cultofandroid.com/[....]bad-reviews-about-htc-devices/
http://www.thevine.com.au/lif[....]-fake-reviews-20131026-267316/
http://www.theverge.com/2013/[....]r-posting-negative-htc-reviews
@Tsepz_GP
Display mate claimed most true to life colors and many other lies.
[ This Message was edited by: josephnero on 2014-05-22 22:42 ]
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 23:35:59
Edit :
Quote
Shameful from Samsung yes but totally irrelevant to your previous post
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 23:38:42
Edit :
Quote
@aussieland1
how irrelevant?paying bloggers to write positive reviews?third one.check it
They had to pay 45M to lg for paying to get their products bashed in korea.
also i'm not forcing you to believe my accusations.it's up to you to believe them or not
[ This Message was edited by: josephnero on 2014-05-22 22:43 ]
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 23:40:08
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-05-22 23:40:08, josephnero wrote:
@aussieland1
how irrelevant?paying bloggers to write positive reviews?third one.check it
They had to pay 45M to lg for paying to get their products bashed in korea.
[ This Message was edited by: josephnero on 2014-05-22 22:41 ]
You said they paid websites. They didn't. You should start trying to climb out of the hole you've dug yourself into.
--
Posted: 2014-05-22 23:44:41
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
