Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
Bookmark topic
4.5 is the original c002 driver lol
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:10:33
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-11 15:00:32, flintolino wrote:
@Quick
Btw I remember you were talking about how good 4.5 could be and Im getting to the same conclusion. It's been hard to beat 4.5 @ outdoor pictures.
Macro sucks tho =P
I've seen the best photos taken with 4.5, I think that this is one of the best but 4.3 included in the R1N035 is better, better color, better control of exposure, better balance, better speed and better quality in relation to the compression, but the 4.3 worked better in R1N035 because in the R1A008 lost..... something!
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:12:13
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-11 15:10:33, flintolino wrote:
4.5 is the original c002 driver lol
oh now i get it
R1BC002 that was..
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:19:53
Edit :
Quote
@ jemp - ok go to that one and stay with it. R1N035 is the best... go go!
@ the rest... let's remain at "Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750".. i think this is the topic... this is the verry main subject of discutions.
PLEASE DON'T post offtopic... let's remain @ comaparisons, conclusions, mistakes, good points..etc..
LET's discuss only what it matters. I promise to make an topic... "Which driver is the best" ... and you can continue there... OK...
E_rezan... pls read my post and give me a reply pls...
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:20:33
Edit :
Quote
Am i in the lime light now?
You want explanations,you see ver2.72..
I just tweaking it to the max capabilities...tell me to explain,i dont bother to,coz explanations is included in the ver2.72,i'm juz sharing what i tried...
I never boast anything...you want to be the genius and think my work isnt up to your standard,den you can do it by follwing instructions on v2.72
Btw if you think you can do better,just go ahead,the red carpet is yours...more variations,more choices,the better it is for users....
My 2cents...
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:23:24
Edit :
Quote
nope... i cannot! Please .... go ahead on the red carpet... i preffer to stay in shadows.
1) I didn't asked you explanations as imperative mode.
2) I'm tired to chase an subject on 20 pages... because replies are most of them off topic..
3) ok.. you answer: you continue to tweak 2.72 (with or without spot?)
4) I prefer what i prefer and this is for me only. here i can post only pertinent and objective photos and oppinions.
i just saw a difrence in parameters in buffer size lenght. so.. why? maybe you can explain...
and your work will never succed to satisfy all the users.
my point was that you give to much attention to macro mode part.. ignoring the most use part: normal mode, no night, no flash, no adjustment.
I want to saw you at a tenis match betwen your girl and other friends.. tring to take her photos in macro.. during the game... (it' just an example ofcourse)
[ This Message was edited by: gxg on 2006-09-11 14:32 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:27:49
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-11 15:27:49, gxg wrote:
nope... i cannot! Please .... go ahead on the red carpet... i preffer to stay in shadows.
1) I didn't asked you explanations as imperative mode.
2) I'm tired to chase an subject on 20 pages... because replies are most of them off topic..
3) ok.. you answer: you continue to tweak 2.72 (with or without spot?)
4) I prefer what i prefer and this is for me only. here i can post only pertinent and objective photos and oppinions.
@gxg
I dont tweak 2.72...dont jump to conclusion when you don't even know the root of it....
It is a breed mixture of 5.3,2.4,10.01,9.91,9.89 and some of my personal bits i edited...
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:32:00
Edit :
Quote
Read it everyday so at the end of the day you got only 2-4 pages to read instead of 20
ehhehe
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:32:12
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-11 15:20:33, gxg wrote:
@ jemp - ok go to that one and stay with it. R1N035 is the best... go go!
Jajajajaja... We do Know why we have never tested R1N035 seriously. But I had a problem with my phone and SEUS and I was forced to use R1N035 for a long time, the new e_erzans driver reminds me the quality I saw only when using R1N035..... That was my point indeed....
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:33:10
Edit :
Quote
e_rezan.. read my post again... i edited when you replies... and .. I asked you... and i thot that you answer me
thats it!
--
Posted: 2006-09-11 15:34:07
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
