>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition
Bookmark topic
APS-C sensors are usually found on entrylevel-midrange DSLRs, in terms of size they are 13x larger than regular compact camera sensors, and the one used in Honami's camera (1/2.3")
here's a size comparison chart
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 08:51:34
Edit :
Quote
@Tai
Anything else you can read?
@Topic
Can anyone confirm that Xperia i1 is indeed the official name for Honami ? That's what I'm hearing. No more alphabets.
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2013-08-15 07:51 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 08:51:43
Edit :
Quote
Apologies. The rest of the lines are not readable. Unless you guys Have other interesting sites or links post here so I can go through? Therefore currently still no answers to the internal memory.
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 08:58:20
Edit :
Quote
Calmly this time guys !
Undeniably the hardware and software photographic Honami are promising, and the sample leaked image is of excellent quality !
But to say that it will offer photographic results superior to those present in the 808 Pureview, has a long distance !
Remember:
Lens: Honami (
Sony G Wide Angle 28 mm) Vs 808 Pureview (
Zeiss Vario Tessar 26 mm)
Sensor Size: Honami (
1/2.3") Vs 808 Pureview (
1/1.2")
Resolution: Honami 20.6 MP (
5248 x 3936) vs 41.4 MP (
7728 × 5368)
Pixel Size "Microns": Honami (
1.176) Vs 808 Pureview
(1.4 In Full Resolution) And In Mode Pureview 3.07 (8MP), 3.91 (5MP) And 4.89 (3MP)
DPI: Honami (
72) Vs 808 Pureview (
300)
Flash: Honami (
LED) Vs 808 Pureview (
Xenon 3rd Generation)
ISP: Honami (
Sony Bionz) Vs 808 Pureview (
Broadcom/Nokia Pureview)
P.S: There is still a long way to go for something that appears better than the 808 Pureview, my guess is that Honami maximum offer better results than the 1020 !
The only ones Sony lightweight and compact devices that offer the best photographic results that the 808 Pureview, they call RX100 and RX100 II !!![ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-08-15 08:15 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 09:08:30
Edit :
Quote
@razec: thnx for answering
..my mind is swarming with loads of camera related questions...maybe i ll bombard your inbox with it later
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 09:13:06
Edit :
Quote
@sonysta
I don't think anybody even mentioned about 808(let alone say that i1 will match/beat it), we are only discussing 1020 vs i1.
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2013-08-15 08:17 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 09:15:05
Edit :
Quote
You're always overreacting Sonysta
and needles to say, wider angle lens doesn't mean better image quality
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-08-15 08:17 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 09:16:03
Edit :
Quote
supercoolman Posts: > 500
when Sonysta overreact, we get more details on camera differences between devices. i kind of enjoy it
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 09:19:15
Edit :
Quote
Randomuser...
Razec previously stated that Honami would be better than the 808 Pureview, something totally unrealistic !
For best calculations algorithms that are applied in camera Honami, such a feat is impossible and the reasons we all know !
But I agree with you and most !
1020 has a camera disappointing and Honami has everything to offer the best photographic results that the Windows Phone Nokia !
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 09:26:06
Edit :
Quote
what happened to your original account anyway?
I'm hoping some lowlight picture samples will leak that was taken with the more recent software for honami. So far I think it's safe to assume that daylight pics are of good quality already
since the sample is very promising in terms of IQ.
--
Posted: 2013-08-15 09:27:53
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
