Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
Bookmark topic
regarding to this pics...i rate c902 slightly higher.......(the real camera i give a crap about)
¤ c902 (more natural colours and slightly better details)
¤ N95 (quite good quality, still Nokia colours)
¤ c702 (quite good, still a bit to blurred in larger views)
(nice comparison

...
im not going to fill up this c902 thread with more compare pics...(see the rest yourself
c702
http://se.0x0f.net/shootout/c702/landscape-1.jpg
c902
http://se.0x0f.net/shootout/c902/landscape-1.jpg
n95
http://se.0x0f.net/shootout/n95/landscape-1.jpg[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-29 23:23 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-29 23:40:14
Edit :
Quote
The Palace of Culture (Iasi, Romania)
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 07:30:48
Edit :
Quote
i updated to latest R3EA038 last night, and boy does it runs smoothly
(the photo-quality is better, no doubt about that

)
taken indoor, macro mode
full size
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19423
full size....really nice quality
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19424[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-30 11:08 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 10:38:26
Edit :
Quote
More macro madness
Photo taken in low lighting by the way.
Full size:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=19428[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-04-30 15:13 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 15:59:11
Edit :
Quote
C902_R3EA038_ camdriver0.dat
// 2008-07-23 Rev 2.1 Released
// 2008-05-29 Rev 2.0 Released
LCD software versions
Main display
Current 200804080
Camera software versions
Camera
Current 2.1
Video call camera
Current 1.3
Java software version
JP-8.3.3
for cam
C902_R3DA028=C902_R3EA037=C902_R3EA038
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 17:28:21
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-29 23:20:29, plankgatan wrote:
and blerk, i dont think you realize how good c902 photo flash is IF you use it properly.
(its way better then ordinary led)
macro flash
full darkness......~1m
full darkness.......~1.5m
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-29 22:27 ]
The c902 flash is really bad, as does apply to all flashes on phones, it isnt really a flash, more like a white light. Thats why i am getting rid of my c902, i am getting a c905 for the exeon flash
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 17:46:49
Edit :
Quote
10123...well, my flash works great (especially outdoor at night, such a improvement on the quality), by the way, who gives a crap, just get rid of it and buy a new phone who fits you better.
-------------------------------------------------
on topic....
its hard to don't use the camera when it produce such insane colours and everything
super-vibrant
super-contrast

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-30 22:31 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 17:53:19
Edit :
Quote
Seems to me the only issue with low light macro on the C902 is that the LED is stronger than past cameras. That is good in some cases and less so in others. Ideal would be a lower flash setting for closeup shots or even better a toggle for "high" and "low".
Until then, the lower powered LED's may produce better macro shots in low light.
Very tough also to find the best angles and all that... sometimes better to play around with focusing in one spot (to read that locations light/dark) then snapping the spot you want. Etc etc etc. Not really point at shoot at that point. Ditto for covering the flash partially.
--
Posted: 2009-04-30 18:41:43
Edit :
Quote
Picture of my bedsheets in a dark room, flash fired. Full size looks good normally these kind of patterns are not so easy to capture.
Full:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=19439
--
Posted: 2009-05-01 00:59:47
Edit :
Quote
ha en fin Valborg alla svensk jävlar

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-01 03:00 ]
--
Posted: 2009-05-01 03:57:45
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply