>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition
Bookmark topic
Those people clearly didn't check the EXIF data or have no idea what is high ISO photography
the last time I checked dpreview.com, even the 808 pureview at full resolution looked crap at such setting
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-08-18 04:59 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 05:57:43
Edit :
Quote
I've to agree with Razec, some people here are just hell bent on mindless trolling. If the pics are crap we will say that, nobody is gonna sugarcoat the crappy nature of the pics.
But before saying "crap" kindly go and compare ISO1000 low light shots from other cameraphones and also cybershot HX50V. To me these samples look comparable to the HX50V.
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 06:04:43
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-08-18 05:57:43, razec wrote:
Those people clearly didn't check the EXIF data or have no idea what is high ISO photography
the last time I checked dpreview.com, even the 808 pureview at full resolution looked crap at such setting
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-08-18 04:59 ]
I'm not very good at photography and I'm not a photographer so I'm a noob but don't these people know that high ISO lead to more grain in picture? It's not so complicated
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 06:09:12
Edit :
Quote
Ok time for some reality check...
my ancient canon 1100D (APS-C) vs HX200v (1/2.3" sensor) vs Galaxy Camera (1/2.3" sensor) vs 808 pureview (at full resolution mode 8mp)
my ancient canon 1100D (APS-C) vs HX200v (1/2.3" sensor) vs Galaxy Camera (1/2.3" sensor) vs 808 pureview (at pureview mode 8mp)
ALL SHOT AT ISO 800
I did my part on the challenge, now where were those trolls who are expecting brilliant pictures at ISO800-1000?
my apologies for these seemingly arrogant post, but I want some of you guys to get the point, higher ISO leads to noise, and that's normal. TBH those examples reflect those that I've seen previously. I once said Honami's photos are good up to ISO400, and photos shot at ISO800 above are very noisy, and that's what exactly reflects with these leaked samples isn't it?
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-08-18 05:20 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 06:17:16
Edit :
Quote
come on guys.. don't even waste your time defending anything against people who clearly just want to trash the photo samples, honami, and sony. i'm not sure what pleasure they get out of doing it, but i guess everyone has their hobbies.
truthfully, the pictures are crappy.. but basically any camera phone and most point and shoots at that high of an ISO will produce crappy pictures. so it's not really saying anything.
i'm not worried
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 06:17:53
Edit :
Quote
Trolls are always trolls wherever you prove. They may get paid to do so to make a living. So it is wise for all of us to just leave them alone.
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 06:27:38
Edit :
Quote
LOL. Samsung galaxy camera with it's 16mp and similar size sensor looks crap compared to sony hx200v. I thought lower mp will lead to better image quality
[ This Message was edited by: kurtdean on 2013-08-18 05:35 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 06:33:24
Edit :
Quote
and look at that prized 808 pureview, at full res ISO800 the HX200V is trashing it. at 8MP pureview mode, it may look alot less noisier than the cybershot, but it resolves alot less details, so much for oversampling
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 06:51:31
Edit :
Quote
supercoolman Posts: > 500
this defending against troll by razec is good. you can learn something today
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 06:54:02
Edit :
Quote
Suddently, the trolls seems so quite here. I wonder what happened
--
Posted: 2013-08-18 06:55:15
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
