On 2008-09-02 08:42:15, Vipera ammodytes wrote:
all what i can say is to take a look here http://www.eprice.com.tw/mobile/news/?news_id=7117 guys, we dont have any sample images with that plank review
Yeah. From those photos posted, there is no need for debate. 6220 (N82) eats C902 for lunch and still have room for seconds (esp. for shots taken by with flash the C902 is really horrible indeed.)
-- Posted: 2008-09-02 09:27:19 Edit :
Quote
I was pretty impressed by the 6220c pictures in the 4 way review posted earlier. Beat the pants of the C902 pics in the review, which had fuzzy details compared to the 6220.
But muhammad's pictures are much much better than those posted in the review tbh. These are actually more what I would expect. They have crisp lines and sharp detail. Makes me wonder why the c902/6220 review has such bad C902 examples?
It's like those above are taken with a completely different camera (although exif details confirm both are c902)
-- Posted: 2008-09-02 10:27:25 Edit :
Quote
