>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Xperia arc discussion Thread
Bookmark topic
What?? That cannot be right
I thought the old x10 had 512
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 20:01:54
Edit :
Quote
This is what he said "Different manufacturers use different type of numbers in their specs communication. Amount of total “RAM” in my sample according to some benchmarking apps and the inbuilt system info seems to be around 313 MB and the amount of storage memory for applications seems to be around 380 MB. (Important to remember that my sample still has early SW so don’t take these numbers as facts!)"
X10 doesn't have 512 AFAIK, rather 384 or something in that order
Edit: my X10 have 165 MB available RAM after startup.
[ This Message was edited by: tyko on 2011-01-07 19:12 ]
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 20:07:54
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-01-07 20:01:54, Bonovox wrote:
What?? That cannot be right
I thought the old x10 had 512
Where on earth did you get that from (the picure below is from
www.swedroid.se) ??
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2011-01-07 22:28 ]
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 20:54:01
Edit :
Quote
I dunno
--
Posted: 2011-01-07 21:33:42
Edit :
Quote
honestly this phone remind me of the days SE have T610 or K700.
on hardware/ electronics.... those phone was far behind what Nokia offering during that time.
even for W880...when it was out...spec isn't good but selling point is thickness
now SE also have similar situation for Arc...hardware...it don't have AMOLED but well...majority of the phone maker is trying to avoid it due to capacity issue in the industry....and other stuff on electronics as well.
because SE focus on the style...just like T610/ K700 which were HIT product even with an lag behind electronics put in.
Those two product have very lousy display and camera compare to others when it was out.
Now I just wish the price is right with proper marketing since Arc is in my opinion the nicest looking ANdroid phone announced so far in 2011....all the others maker are sickening....Samsung and LG in particular....its just like they get a copy machine taking the stuff out from iPHONE..... really feel like Samsung and LG is trying hard to be "SHAN ZAI" brand to APPLE.
opssss enough nagging hehe...once I got the budget, I will definitely look into what to get....Arc or the still unannounced Zeus. Arc got the advantage due to its style.
--
Posted: 2011-01-08 01:03:27
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-01-08 01:03:27, c96sthl wrote:
honestly this phone remind me of the days SE have T610 or K700.
on hardware/ electronics.... those phone was far behind what Nokia offering during that time.
even for W880...when it was out...spec isn't good but selling point is thickness
now SE also have similar situation for Arc...hardware...it don't have AMOLED but well...majority of the phone maker is trying to avoid it due to capacity issue in the industry....and other stuff on electronics as well.
because SE focus on the style...just like T610/ K700 which were HIT product even with an lag behind electronics put in.
On what part of the hardware is this phone far behind the other offerings out there?
--
Posted: 2011-01-08 01:13:44
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-01-08 01:03:27, c96sthl wrote:
honestly this phone remind me of the days SE have T610 or K700.
on hardware/ electronics.... those phone was far behind what Nokia offering during that time.
even for W880...when it was out...spec isn't good but selling point is thickness
now SE also have similar situation for Arc...hardware...it don't have AMOLED but well...majority of the phone maker is trying to avoid it due to capacity issue in the industry....and other stuff on electronics as well.
because SE focus on the style...just like T610/ K700 which were HIT product even with an lag behind electronics put in.
Those two product have very lousy display and camera compare to others when it was out.
Now I just wish the price is right with proper marketing since Arc is in my opinion the nicest looking ANdroid phone announced so far in 2011....all the others maker are sickening....Samsung and LG in particular....its just like they get a copy machine taking the stuff out from iPHONE..... really feel like Samsung and LG is trying hard to be "SHAN ZAI" brand to APPLE.
opssss enough nagging hehe...once I got the budget, I will definitely look into what to get....Arc or the still unannounced Zeus. Arc got the advantage due to its style.
+1, and I think that you should also consider the hallon.
@S4k1s: no dual core=2010 phone for the geeks (
), plus it hasn't got an oled/amoled/super amoled/ superamoledplus screen...
I
SE
[ This Message was edited by: KU on 2011-01-08 00:51 ]
--
Posted: 2011-01-08 01:46:33
Edit :
Quote
Why does it need a oled/amoled/super amoled/ superamoledplus screen if its screen is just as good or better?
And why does it need to have dual-core? You need to look at the package not only the cpu. It's pretty retarded to just look at the CPU and say oh that phone is ages behind the rest.
--
Posted: 2011-01-08 02:15:16
Edit :
Quote
becose actually a smartphone doesn't deserve to be good or ever excelent, but it deserve to be the best or it is just sh*t for some people every detail are very important...
But the lack of front facing camera is really a bad thing, So I hope the hallon is great or I am gonna pass through that and get my Xperia Arc.
--
Posted: 2011-01-08 03:04:42
Edit :
Quote
Yes, because video calls are so amazing and widely used
--
Posted: 2011-01-08 03:24:07
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
