>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Sony Xperia V thread
Bookmark topic
On 2012-09-20 14:05:13, goldenface wrote:
Touch focus seems the better option, although it would have been nice to have had a camera button as well.
Don't forget touchscreen doesn't work that good under water!
--
Posted: 2012-09-20 14:17:12
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-09-20 14:17:12, mediar wrote:
On 2012-09-20 14:05:13, goldenface wrote:
Touch focus seems the better option, although it would have been nice to have had a camera button as well.
Don't forget touchscreen doesn't work that good under water!
Prove it to me!
--
Posted: 2012-09-20 18:13:03
Edit :
Quote
Doesn't the V have wet finger tracking? I'd like to see how this worked underwater. Are there any Acro S demos?
--
Posted: 2012-09-20 18:59:05
Edit :
Quote
Guys the touchscreen doesn't work underwater. Wet Finger Tracking only applies when its used in the rain or there is a splash of water on the screen.
--
Posted: 2012-09-21 04:59:21
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-09-21 04:59:21, randomuser wrote:
Guys the touchscreen doesn't work underwater. Wet Finger Tracking only applies when its used in the rain or there is a splash of water on the screen.
So the only way to capture underwater pics is to use self timer before sinking
--
Posted: 2012-09-21 10:16:25
Edit :
Quote
^
Good IDea Razec
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2012-09-21 09:28 ]
--
Posted: 2012-09-21 10:28:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-09-19 21:49:23, Ravager wrote:
Do we know anything else about the metal frame, is it's real metal or just chromed plastic?
[ This Message was edited by: Ravager on 2012-09-19 20:49 ]
It's chromed plastic and I'm afraid with a time chrome will fade away which will make the phone look horrible. On the other hand, people say it's very well built, so hopefully my fears won't come true. Anyway, IMHO that chromed plastic is bigger issue than commonly mentioned favorites - lack of camera button and VGA front facing camera.
All in all, I'm eagerly waiting for this phone's release.
--
Posted: 2012-09-21 11:31:08
Edit :
Quote
All I can think of why they put VGA camera on front is may be it does not consume a lot of 3G or Internet data. May be!
--
Posted: 2012-09-21 12:01:42
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-09-21 12:01:42, Indiandawg wrote:
All I can think of why they put VGA camera on front is may be it does not consume a lot of 3G or Internet data. May be!
Makes sense, but V comes with LTE. With this kind of speeds even Full HD front facing camera shouldn't be an issue.
The best solution would be let the user to select what kind of resolution you want to use. I don't think they saving much on a sensor (VGA vs. 720p/1080p).
--
Posted: 2012-09-21 12:31:54
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-09-21 12:31:54, psquare wrote:
On 2012-09-21 12:01:42, Indiandawg wrote:
All I can think of why they put VGA camera on front is may be it does not consume a lot of 3G or Internet data. May be!
Makes sense, but V comes with LTE. With this kind of speeds even Full HD front facing camera shouldn't be an issue.
The best solution would be let the user to select what kind of resolution you want to use. I don't think they saving much on a sensor (VGA vs. 720p/1080p).
Exactly, That's what I thought. I'm sure Sony must have thought too still don't know what's the reason behind VGA. Almost all their phones have 1mp+ front facing camera then why would V have VGA? it's a question to ask Sony cause I'm sure they must be having some valid answer to it.
--
Posted: 2012-09-21 13:44:24
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
