>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> C905 CamDriver Modded
Bookmark topic
my C905 fone
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 08:18:34
Edit :
Quote
i just installed DM3.5
what i noticed is Face detection does not work anymore? is this normal?
btw, what is the difference between the 2 folders effects and iso? ty
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 09:29:55
Edit :
Quote
some pics DM 3.5
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 13:22:37
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-10-08 20:32:22, DarKMaGiCiaN wrote:
@Vit
I recommended to turn off the Color Correction because Color Correction gives more yellow view in indoor shots
and set the scenes to night portrait because it gives more exposure time ^_^
just try it and see
seems like things have slowed down a little..
DM & Eltoffer, are you guys working on any new updates to the c905 cam driver?
thanks
I dont know about Eltoffer
but yes I've been working on new update since panonski complained about the indoor shots
^_^
but my problem is the time
I dont have time to test and edit the driver
also maybe this will be my last driver as satio is started to be available everywhere
I'm just waitting for the official release to buy it ^_^
[ This Message was edited by: DarKMaGiCiaN on 2009-10-08 19:39 ]
I've already did that. Nevertheless, the issue is about colours with the incandescent WB turned on, which doesn't have colour correction. And is not a matter of increasing the exposure time either, it's really a matter of white balance. The colours should have a warm yellow tone to them in order to reproduce the actual scenario, but they have only soft yellow tones.
I've made a mod of your driver, introducing colour correction also for Incandescent White Balance. I am currently testing it, and as soon as I am pleased with it I will post it. I also took down the saturation settings, as sometimes they would provide not too accurate colors.
Thanks for your reply!
[ This Message was edited by: Vit on 2009-10-09 14:48 ]
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 15:44:26
Edit :
Quote
face detection is ok on mine,smile shutter a bit intermittent tho.
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 15:49:21
Edit :
Quote
and a low light shot, no flash
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2009-10-08 23:44 ]
Jake, that's not a low light photo. Low light is when you do not have a strong light source within the picture. In that photo you've got some strong light coming through the blinds. What happens is that the camera measures everything based on that strong light source. So you get a very short exposure time, and the dark areas are almost not seen at all.
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 15:53:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-10-09 13:22:37, fangdue wrote:
some pics DM 3.5
C'mon, people! Enough with macro shots!! Let's try to improve the camera driver beyond that boundary! We all know that it can take great macro shots, but let's go some steps further, please... It's getting really annoying.
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 15:58:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-10-09 15:53:33, Vit wrote:
Jake, that's not a low light photo. Low light is when you do not have a strong light source within the picture. In that photo you've got some strong light coming through the blinds. What happens is that the camera measures everything based on that strong light source. So you get a very short exposure time, and the dark areas are almost not seen at all.
ok, thanks for the clarification Vit.. i learn something new everyday
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 16:14:34
Edit :
Quote
any tip on taking a night shot?
we all know how good it is when its in the day
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 17:41:45
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-10-09 17:41:45, robolee wrote:
any tip on taking a night shot?
we all know how good it is when its in the day
Have a very steady hands or a tripod.
I want to know about indoor shots. =X
--
Posted: 2009-10-09 18:38:28
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
