Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
Bookmark topic
I still see them overexposed. it's my opinion... it's not the ultimate driver, yet...
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 01:15:23
Edit :
Quote
Yes, thats true. But besides that the driver is near perfect. Even the videos are now recording at an amazing 14.4 fps. The pics come out best at -1 step on the exposure settings.
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 01:17:19
Edit :
Quote
of course, this is the best driver i've tested until now. It's great! but i think this is the only thing for this driver to become the ultimate driver. Even turning to -1 in te exposure settings it is overexposed... only repair this and we'll get the really ultimate driver.
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 01:27:08
Edit :
Quote
i tend to agree with
phoeny statement. There's so.... i mean too many camdriver released to test out and i, myself can't catch up aswell..
bro e_erzan, you gotta notice about this my man.. since you're the creator of the recent camdriver, you have the big responsibility to test it out, push as hard as you can with the Camdriver, make sure everything are stable enough and the picture quality are satisfying for you, post your review of the camdriver together with some sample of picture.. and there you go.. your camdriver are ready to be download. it might took a while for doing so but hey, we're dealing with an
Ultimate one right here
No hard feelings bro, just my 2 cents.. and you know i love you right?
i need feedback.. going to work now, will online at 20:00 today
peace~
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 01:38:09
Edit :
Quote
Just to show the exposure difference and noise comparison between 9.90 and 5.6c
Both pictures @ Nightmode:ON / -2.0 for noise killing / Macro off / Fine
9.90
5.6c
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 02:56:07
Edit :
Quote
yeah, agree, thought i like 5.6c a lot, but it seems the picture taken by the driver is overexposure...if this problem fixed, then it would be the ultimate one then
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 03:30:56
Edit :
Quote
That's the only problem with the 5.6x series.. and I warned about it since an early version, when I tried to take a photo of my girl and me with the led on and our noses disapeared. The same thing happened after, when I shot some white flowers that became invisible.
In Flintolino pics we can even notice the difference on the surface that his phone is on. On the first pic we can see details of it, while in the second we hardly can. Although the colors are more attractive on the second pic.
Despite the overexposure issue, 5.6c Better Contrast Reduced Buffer Size is the best, for me.
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 04:56:31
Edit :
Quote
Just talking about Videos, with this configurations above, how much is the "fps" ??
VR_NORMAL_MODE_FR=44;
VR_NIGHT_MODE_FR=28;
I've already asked it before, but no one answered, and i don't even know what those values means .. i don't know anything about Hexa stuffs !!
Because someone told me with this configuration we can get something about "17 fps" in video recording ... is that true ??
Tkx
[ This Message was edited by: chakme on 2006-09-13 04:38 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 05:29:20
Edit :
Quote
May i know which
ORIGINAL camdriver has the best quality?
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 06:53:30
Edit :
Quote
OK i have tested some driver in my office. only indoor coz cant go out heehhe.
so this is my oppinion, if got some mistake so sorry k
Driver 5.6d (buffer 600k), Fine
http://img205.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00467wm9.jpg
Look at the paper at the bottom pic, overexposure. sharp image, look at the monitor.
Driver 9.90, Fine
http://img247.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00468tu3.jpg
a little bit dark. the pic look blur coz a bit dark i guess.
Driver 2.4 Hybrid, Fine
http://img177.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00469xx1.jpg
not overexposure. sharpness ok
Driver 5.6c (buffer 600k), Fine
http://img177.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00466hb9.jpg
look a bit blue. sharp on focus object but not object around it. look at the monitor. not overexposure.
[ This Message was edited by: 2uk3y on 2006-09-13 06:06 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-13 07:03:21
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
