Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Android : Sony Xperia Z1
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Android > Sony Xperia Z1 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 166167168 ... 555556557>

Gitaroo Posts: > 500

make sense since c6902 is cheaper than the rest by quite a bit
--
Posted: 2013-09-18 23:28:34
Edit : Quote

sponse Posts: 252


On 2013-09-18 23:15:06, mobisekim wrote:
http://www.3dnews.ru/761401/page-2.html overview display Z1


i don't bealive it, he says the contrast ratio of the screen is 1:262
thats Bull$$#@$t.
--
Posted: 2013-09-18 23:32:01
Edit : Quote

DexterMoser Posts: 443


On 2013-09-18 14:00:10, amirprog wrote:
[...]
ok, but my question is different.
first of all the "shatter proof" or better announced "shatter resistance" is only when the film is on the Z1. second, i asked: "is a filmless Z1 more sensitive then a filmless iphone 4/4s?"
answer only someone who knows for sure.
[ This Message was edited by: amirprog on 2013-09-18 13:04 ]


Well, "is a filmless Z1 more sensitive then a filmless iphone 4/4s?":

If the phone falls exactly on the same spot on the ground and in the exact same direction (both is very unlikely in real life) then the shatter proof foil would not make any noticeable difference. If your screen cracks at a certain drop, your screen protector wouldn't make any difference.
Maybe the difference could be measured, it is a piece of plastic, it absorbs an amount of energy (very very little).

A clear answer to your question: Yes!
But that's only due to the way larger screen size. It has nothing to do with the existence of a screen protector.
A 5" piece of glass will break easier than 3,5"
--
Posted: 2013-09-18 23:36:42
Edit : Quote

my ninja Posts: > 500

Interesting to finally see some measurements of the screen. However.. How can one site measure 1500+:1 CR and this russian site measure 260:1.. I mean, either someones measurements are off, or theres a larger problem abroad. I would love to get a clear word, if not.. having to wait for the 06 may not be such a horrible thing..
--
Posted: 2013-09-18 23:43:32
Edit : Quote

Dave_c Posts: 5


On 2013-09-18 23:28:34, Gitaroo wrote:
make sense since c6902 is cheaper than the rest by quite a bit


What's the difference between 6902, 6903 etc?
--
Posted: 2013-09-18 23:47:21
Edit : Quote

Gitaroo Posts: > 500

one is hspa+ only and one support lte I think.
--
Posted: 2013-09-18 23:55:03
Edit : Quote

Geoffxx Posts: 265


On 2013-09-18 23:32:01, sponse wrote:

On 2013-09-18 23:15:06, mobisekim wrote:
http://www.3dnews.ru/761401/page-2.html overview display Z1


i don't bealive it, he says the contrast ratio of the screen is 1:262
thats Bull$$#@$t.


I'm not sure it is - unless this was not a retail version we are seeing a very distinct picture taking place, some Z1's have a screen comparable to the Z and some have a screen comparable to the ZU or better, I have not seen a pattern that the C6902 has the lesser screen simply because the reviews don't readily give that info or do they actually state it is a retail version - I didn't know the C6902 was a lot cheaper - why is that ?
[ This Message was edited by: Geoffxx on 2013-09-18 23:05 ]

--
Posted: 2013-09-19 00:04:50
Edit : Quote

DexterMoser Posts: 443


On 2013-09-18 23:26:39, DACHA wrote:
Interesting reviews. Some reviews have a Z1 that has the best display on the market and some have a Z1 that has the same display as the Z.
In my opinion it is obvious that my source was right about the display lottery. Most of the low quality displays will be used for C6902. People getting the C6903, C9643 or the C6906 will most likely end up with an excellent display.


I'm not going to buy the C6902, hence this is good news
[ This Message was edited by: DexterMoser on 2013-09-18 23:14 ]

--
Posted: 2013-09-19 00:12:06
Edit : Quote

rphilippe Posts: 49


On 2013-09-18 22:35:57, moogoo wrote:
rphilippe - you sure? according to the manual, there is also an 8mp 3:4 mode in addition to the 16:9 mode. but like Geoffxx said.. the 16:9 mode samples the 20mp down to 8mp, which is supposed to give better results than straight 8mp..




I just mean that I like the 16:9 mode, but I thought it weird that the resolution is only 8mp

Yes there is also a 3:4 setting too.

But I see that if it is supposed to be good, then that's ok.

20mp - 8mp is quite a jump though still.
--
Posted: 2013-09-19 00:17:32
Edit : Quote

Geoffxx Posts: 265

think of it like this

you have a box that is 8cm2 and you stuff 20cm2 of pixels in there - it will look very compact and smooth



BTW guys if my Z1 which arrives today has a screen the same as a Z it will be going back in the box - It needs to be as good as the ZU I had, not that the Z was bad but the ZU is in a different ballpark and I was under the impression the Z1 would be also
[ This Message was edited by: Geoffxx on 2013-09-18 23:27 ]

--
Posted: 2013-09-19 00:21:40
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 166167168 ... 555556557>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home