>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony Ericsson K700 discussion
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2004-06-15 15:26:13, TeleSaint wrote:
The other manufacturers noticed this and went a step further then SE.
Everytime that Sonyericsson release a phone, we have such comments that SE will be beaten but they are still here and have allways good results with the phones
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 16:25:37
Edit :
Quote
Any who give me file name of any pictures taken with k700 camera PLZ PLZ! Greeting from SErbia and Montenegro!
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 16:26:27
Edit :
Quote
Anyone who says the K700 is old is delluded. I certainly dont think its old. It might not have expandable memory, or the flashy Symbian interface, or stereo speakers.. but that doesnt make it old at all, its how SE have designed it. If they put in stereo speakers, a higher resolution camera and a duo slot the price would go through the roof.
I'd rather have a K700 over a S65, 7610 or E398 any day because of its style, features and usablility. If i wanted a smartphone with pretty much everything the S65 and 7610 has, id buy a P900 (again).
The K700's rivals are phones like the V600, phones aimed at the youth market who want a phone with lots of features but dont want the size, weight and price of smartphones. They want a phone thats good at what its meant for, and the K700 certainly is that.
You cant compare the 7610 to the K700, of course its camera will be of better quality - it doesnt make it the better phone for everyone. You wouldnt compare a GX30 to a K700 would you ? the K700 is miles ahead of its Sharp rival, except for the camera resolution.
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 16:38:34
Edit :
Quote
@etaab - fully agree with you!!
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 16:43:03
Edit :
Quote
Does the K700 have a service menu, like the T68/T610 etc etc.? i.e. the one you get to by pressing >*
@caff - it looks like the clock on the standby screen of the K700 is a lot clearer than on phones like the T610 - is that just the picture or is it a lot clearer to see? It looks from the picture like the clock would look like if the phone had a monochrome screen - i.e. a grey background with black figures. Have I got that right?
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 16:44:14
Edit :
Quote
yes, and mine shows firmware version is R2A041
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 16:46:33
Edit :
Quote
You know when if first saw that picture, i thought it was an old B&W mono colour screen. It looks like the screen from a 3210
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 16:51:46
Edit :
Quote
the competitors of the k700 are phones at the same price, the features are important but price will dictate what it competes agianst then features take over.
if it cost £300 and the nokia 7610 costs that tehn its competition as anyone with £300 will have a chose to make same with the siemens .
you dont just buy what has features you buy what you can afford
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 17:05:57
Edit :
Quote
TheRealSpawn Posts: > 500
#TeleSaint
Why are the S65 better than the K700 ? you say it has better screen - not true - it has a larger screen, but with fewer pixels (132x176). K700 has a smaller screen with higher resolution (176x220) - this makes the screen of the K700 sharper. So the S65 screen is not better - only bigger. The S65 only has 11mb onboard memory - K700 has 41. Yes I know the S65 has external memorysupport - but it doesnt play mp3 or wave so the external memory is only for storing pictures and nothing else. S65 also does not have a Radio. S65 also does not have BT - which means I cant use my BT headset with it.
The K700 is also smaller and more stylish imho - S65 is to big for my taste.
What it does have is a higher resolution camera - thats about it - but Im buying a phone that can take pictures, not a camera that can make calls. Allready have a superb Canon digicam and never use the mobilecam - so mpixel mobilecam is almost irrelevant in my case. And Im buying the overall problemfree functionallity of the S//E phone. Working software, good support, Synchronisation, restrictionfree BT/IRDA, Themes etc. etc.
All in all - I have to disagree that the S65 is a better phone. Its a nice phone - not better - just different than the K700 in which functions are emphasized.
And the N7610 ?
Oh I wont even begin with that one - thats "just" a n6600 with a new ugly ugly design, a terrible keypad, and a 1mpixel camera. I like the n6600 better.
[ This Message was edited by: TheRealSpawn on 2004-06-15 16:47 ]
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 17:39:12
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-06-15 17:39:12, TheRealSpawn wrote:
but Im buying a phone that can take pictures, not a camera that can make calls.
OMG, this must be the most beautiful qoute i've heard involving mobile phones!!!
SOOOOOOO true...
--
Posted: 2004-06-15 17:49:40
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
