General discussions : General : N82 or K850.
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> N82 or K850.
Bookmark topic
On 2008-01-22 13:14:36, Waspinator wrote:
Shame on Nokia,the bundled earphones are crap and the loudspeaker is a joke.Nokia does not changed,they are still crap.
@QVGA:Majority of the people likes megabass:).Also a person didn't force himself to select his likes n dislikes.
[ This Message was edited by: Waspinator on 2008-01-22 12:43 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Waspinator on 2008-01-22 12:44 ]
Pull yourself togheter. Are SE better? Have you heard the bundled K850i headphones or heard its muffled loudspeaker? Even a semi-deaf person would be able to hear that the N82 loudspeakers is way better, higher and of course it is in STEREO.
The majority of people likes movies made Michael Bay. That does not make them clever or of very high quality. You do know what a "lowest common demeanor" is?
[ This Message was edited by: Trentors on 2008-01-26 11:25 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 12:24:03
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-26 12:24:03, Trentors wrote:
On 2008-01-22 13:14:36, Waspinator wrote:
Shame on Nokia,the bundled earphones are crap and the loudspeaker is a joke.Nokia does not changed,they are still crap.
@QVGA:Majority of the people likes megabass:).Also a person didn't force himself to select his likes n dislikes.
[ This Message was edited by: Waspinator on 2008-01-22 12:43 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Waspinator on 2008-01-22 12:44 ]
Pull yourself togheter. Are SE better? Have you heard the bundled K850i headphones or heard its muffled loudspeaker? Even a semi-deaf person would be able to hear that the N82 loudspeakers is way better, higher and of course it is in STEREO.
The majority of people likes movies made Michael Bay. That does not make them clever or of very high quality. You do know what a "lowest common demeanor" is?
[ This Message was edited by: Trentors on 2008-01-26 11:25 ]
I don't know about the K850 but have you ever heard a W810i with good quality earphones,it pwns N82 in my opinion.
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 12:47:54
Edit :
Quote
Mods please lock this thread.
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 12:52:22
Edit :
Quote
@waspinator
I don't know about the K850 but have you ever heard a W810i with good quality earphones,it pwns N82 in my opinion.
I think you are wrong. On a good set of headphones N82 leaves W810 in the dust. W810 sounds decent only with narrow range loud and bang type music. With more sosphicated music W810 just doesnt cut it. It is like listening to music with half of the orchestra missing.
Needless to say, if you say W810 sound is better, then you most probably like music which will leave you deaf during the later part of your life.
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 13:34:36
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-26 13:34:36, mib1800 wrote:
@waspinator
I don't know about the K850 but have you ever heard a W810i with good quality earphones,it pwns N82 in my opinion.
W810 sounds decent only with narrow range loud and bang type music. With more sosphicated music W810 just doesnt cut it. It is like listening to music with half of the orchestra missing.
Needless to say, if you say W810 sound is better, then you most probably like music which will leave you deaf during the later part of your life.
narrow range loud and bang type music.
what this?
With more sosphicated music W810 just doesnt cut it
and this
now explain to me what bang type music is..lets say rock? heavy metal? techno etc? you got something against people that like different kinds of music compared lets say your orchestra music hmm? i have no problem with any music as long as it sounds good..and im not saying that you like orchestra music either im just setting a line here..
for stooges - in this thread that dont know what pairing a phone with good to great quality headsets/head phones can do to quality of music and audio/
Also remember bit rates learn to set that shizzle above 192kbps and that will help your quality too.
Oh so this is a music thing now huh? i wonder what shizzle music you listen to?hmm?
As this thread is realy pissing me the fcuk off
i dont have to read it but when people start talkin shit i have to reply for my sake and for faggoteers
cut the shiz both have there ups and downs smiles and frowns so get over it and enjoy your damn phones,,
lataz and god speed fan boys in general..jebem vam majku..pitiful fools..
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 13:57:39
Edit :
Quote
Most songs are ACC encoded(96kbps).
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 15:11:56
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-26 15:11:56, Waspinator wrote:
Most songs are ACC encoded(96kbps).
How can you listen to AAC in 96 kbps? It sounds terrible! At least encode in 160 kbps AAC (or 128 kbps if you absolutly have no other option) or 192 kbps MP3.
And you cannot discuss sound quality based on 96 kbps AAC. That is absurd.
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 15:58:41
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-26 15:58:41, Trentors wrote:
On 2008-01-26 15:11:56, Waspinator wrote:
Most songs are ACC encoded(96kbps).
How can you listen to AAC in 96 kbps? It sounds terrible! At least encode in 160 kbps AAC (or 128 kbps if you absolutly have no other option) or 192 kbps MP3.
And you cannot discuss sound quality based on 96 kbps AAC. That is absurd.
He himself is absurd. Judging quality by listening on 96kbps is the most retarded thing i've ever heard.
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 16:01:13
Edit :
Quote
@DarkKrypt
Relax there - you sound like Vicky Pollard
I think I agree with you, and you are right. Both phones have their ups and downs but I just happen to think the N82 has more ups (and I do own both phones and have been a long time SE fan). But the N82 is under some heavy fire for some very lame accusations that is simply made to justify people’s choice of the K850. Like this whole sound quality thing. The K850 is not "far superior" in this area - they are very much on par but people make it sound like the N82 has bad sound and that is soooo pathetic.
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 16:05:16
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-26 15:58:41, Trentors wrote:
On 2008-01-26 15:11:56, Waspinator wrote:
Most songs are ACC encoded(96kbps).
How can you listen to AAC in 96 kbps? It sounds terrible! At least encode in 160 kbps AAC (or 128 kbps if you absolutly have no other option) or 192 kbps MP3.
And you cannot discuss sound quality based on 96 kbps AAC. That is absurd.
I thought acc works best on low bitrates.Also i feel no difference in 128kpbs of mp3 and 96kpbs of aac.
On 2008-01-26 16:01:13, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-01-26 15:58:41, Trentors wrote:
On 2008-01-26 15:11:56, Waspinator wrote:
Most songs are ACC encoded(96kbps).
How can you listen to AAC in 96 kbps? It sounds terrible! At least encode in 160 kbps AAC (or 128 kbps if you absolutly have no other option) or 192 kbps MP3.
And you cannot discuss sound quality based on 96 kbps AAC. That is absurd.
He himself is absurd.
Gibberish! never expected this from you.
--
Posted: 2008-01-26 19:41:30
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
