>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post comments and pictures about/from C702 here
Bookmark topic
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
No point arguing or getting nasty though. It doesn't help anyone. Your opinion is your opinion, not anybody else's.
--
Posted: 2008-07-13 12:59:30
Edit :
Quote
he he... ok ok..you mean this pics ????
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00001.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00027.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00002-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00025.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00001-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00023.jpg
i cant say what is what on this pics....
but the pics ive seen in different threads...there is k800/k810 better...period
i will not say more about this mather...you guys have a nice & sunny day
------------------------------------------------------------
why i asked about the cam module is because some pages say different things.
example this page say c902 use a Sony MCB971
http://semcblog.wordpress.com/other/cameras/
and mobile review say it use a Samsung (U900) module
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-c902-en.shtml#7
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-13 12:03 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-13 12:05 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-13 13:01:55
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
Well that's the C902. That doesn't mean any info on C702 is wrong as well. It has nothing to do with the C702 in fact. Its more than likely that it is actually correct that it has the Sony unit if there is no evidence otherwise.
--
Posted: 2008-07-13 13:08:32
Edit :
Quote
macro + flash
--
Posted: 2008-07-13 17:12:44
Edit :
Quote
C702's flash is great for macros no chance of it bleaching & burning the pics.
--
Posted: 2008-07-13 17:35:38
Edit :
Quote
nice close up pics... only bad thing with LED flashes is when its require a distance over ~50cm.
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-13 17:22 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-13 18:14:00
Edit :
Quote
all auto with flash
--
Posted: 2008-07-15 17:28:49
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-13 18:14:00, plankgatan wrote:
only bad thing with LED flashes is when its require a distance over ~50cm.
not a bad thing imo,
thats why we call it LED, coz it's main purpose is for macro shot, close up and of course.. flashlight
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 06:03:48
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-09 13:15:46, number1 wrote:
The pictures look fine to me what do you think's wrong with them???.
the photos are too dark,not in the macro with the flash..those in twilight mode..
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 10:41:33
Edit :
Quote
i don't think that c702 and k800 have the same picture quality at the twilinght pictures...i'm i wrong??
--
Posted: 2008-07-16 10:48:07
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
