>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Ericsson T39m opinions
Bookmark topic
@jn u are welcome. Get a t39 asap, even the bt suffer is worth to have it!
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-11-07 16:43:13
Edit :
Quote
It's a nice phone indeed. May be old model, but it's solid, quality made phone, handsome, looks classy, and for that what it's meant- talking- it's great.
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2004-11-07 16:45:56
Edit :
Quote
Not just for calls, way more services for non verbal communications aswell.
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-11-07 18:03:39
Edit :
Quote
What I really liked with this T39m are:
1. It is a flip-type fone.
2. It has a stout external antenna.
3. Bluetooth
4. GPRS
5. Elegantly looking . . .
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 14:25:26
Edit :
Quote
@jn u just missed the most important fact to mention... Its an E R I C S S O N
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 14:36:23
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-11-08 14:36:23, bobafett wrote:
@jn u just missed the most important fact to mention... Its an E R I C S S O N
This message was posted from a T68i
@bobafett - Oh yeah . . . I was just wonderin' here what if Ericsson did not merge with Sony
Will the K7 and S7 be better LOOKING, and have a BETTER specs?
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 14:40:42
Edit :
Quote
@jn think 99% of esato threads is se, lets keep this few for ///
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 15:24:48
Edit :
Quote
@* just a thought.
as true blue (hard core) ericsson (and
) users, dont you think we should vote for the best phone (as per user) built by ericsson?
i know the T39 and R520 will be fighting neck to neck. i think it's about time.
me, i'll vote for T39m
(maybe a new thread?)
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 15:26:02
Edit :
Quote
@bobafett - Yes, and you are just ONE of the very FEW members here who 'resuscitates' old Ericsson issues in your thread with @ivan . . . Nice effort though!
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 15:26:49
Edit :
Quote
Well, honestly... at the heart of all current SE models are all the technology developed by Ericsson way back.. even the current P910 is about 80% Ericsson technology, this includes UIQ which was created and developed by Ericsson... code named Quartz back then... but the skeletal structure of the OS was already complete..tabbed menu and all. Everything that the P800 came with was already actually ready for production as an Ericsson phone... although Ericsson's was supposed to have GPS as well.
I personally feel that when Sony and Ericsson merged, Sony should've contributed cash, manufacturing, and distribution... Ericsson still should've handled research, design, technology.
For me, the biggest thorn that Sony introduced into the mix is their MemoryStick crap... but then, that's business.
With the current phones... I am glad however that Sony is starting to provide the CCDs for the cameras... for whatever it's worth, Sony does make decent digicams... and at least they can maximize their obsolete CCDs by passing them onto SE.
I still miss Ericsson though. I miss their Scandanavian inspired designs. I miss the classy handset designs. I miss their elegance and refinement, that's something Sony took away. But oh well... technology will always change... as will the companies that make them.
--
Posted: 2004-11-08 15:45:10
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
