Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
Bookmark topic
--
Posted: 2009-06-22 13:34:41
Edit :
Quote
RED rose. (must the hardest object to shoot). ______all pics is shot with EV 0.0 and have great brightness. end of story
)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-06-23 10:02 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-23 10:54:05
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-06-22 09:52:51, luhccas-c905 wrote:
On 2009-06-22 03:05:33, mode wrote:
@luhccas-c905
I think your definition of overbright is just a matter of taste. Look at the sky, you can clearly see the blue colour and the texture of the clouds. You can consider classifying a picture as 'overbright' only if there's a white sky background IMO. I think the picture is perfectly fine and a lot of people would love such bright pictures. You're not jealous of Plank's pics are you?
And how about other colors?So,you mean that only blue(white in this case) sky serves as a parameter?I'll say one more time,JUST "overbright" not means the image are bad!My definition of overbright is based on metering mode,contrast,shades and balanced pictures taken with a DSLR(Nikon d-60) camera to use as base of quality.Can you understand that?Why would i envy a simple image man?What'a nonsense comment dude...
As YOU said "a lot of people love such bright pictures",that doesn't mean all of us enjoy.
And looking at his photos,which are generally excellent in 90% of cases,commented only about the BRIGHT ON that pictures!Calm down,is just a comment
[ This Message was edited by: luhccas-c905 on 2009-06-22 08:54 ]
Feeling a bit edgy today luhccas-c905? I'm pretty sure you're the one who needs to calm down. If you read my post again you'll see there's no statement accusing you of anything and a little light comment at the end never hurt anybody. Now I'm really beginning to think you're nitpicking
--
Posted: 2009-06-23 10:57:54
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-06-23 10:57:54, mode wrote:
On 2009-06-22 09:52:51, luhccas-c905 wrote:
On 2009-06-22 03:05:33, mode wrote:
@luhccas-c905
I think your definition of overbright is just a matter of taste. Look at the sky, you can clearly see the blue colour and the texture of the clouds. You can consider classifying a picture as 'overbright' only if there's a white sky background IMO. I think the picture is perfectly fine and a lot of people would love such bright pictures. You're not jealous of Plank's pics are you?
And how about other colors?So,you mean that only blue(white in this case) sky serves as a parameter?I'll say one more time,JUST "overbright" not means the image are bad!My definition of overbright is based on metering mode,contrast,shades and balanced pictures taken with a DSLR(Nikon d-60) camera to use as base of quality.Can you understand that?Why would i envy a simple image man?What'a nonsense comment dude...
As YOU said "a lot of people love such bright pictures",that doesn't mean all of us enjoy.
And looking at his photos,which are generally excellent in 90% of cases,commented only about the BRIGHT ON that pictures!Calm down,is just a comment
[ This Message was edited by: luhccas-c905 on 2009-06-22 08:54 ]
Feeling a bit edgy today luhccas-c905? I'm pretty sure you're the one who needs to calm down. If you read my post again you'll see there's no statement accusing you of anything and a little light comment at the end never hurt anybody. Now I'm really beginning to think you're nitpicking
mode
Forget luhccas-c905 and ignore your comments, he is very fanatic.A simple user who likes to criticize everything, maybe also a critical film.
Nice pics guys!!! more more... mode and yours pics??
--
Posted: 2009-06-23 12:44:55
Edit :
Quote
awesome c902 ALL HAIL C902!!!!
c902 rockz nice photos plank
[ This Message was edited by: mrjulius on 2009-06-23 14:32 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-23 14:35:08
Edit :
Quote
heres my photos low lights adjusting ev
[ This Message was edited by: mrjulius on 2009-06-23 16:18 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-23 17:03:51
Edit :
Quote
@junz
nice photo! how you do that?
need longer shutter right?
@plank
nice rose.
--
Posted: 2009-06-23 17:29:09
Edit :
Quote
wew
[ This Message was edited by: mrjulius on 2009-06-23 16:33 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-23 17:32:52
Edit :
Quote
Yups, ExposureTime : 2.00Sec
--
Posted: 2009-06-23 17:34:22
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-06-23 17:34:22, Junz wrote:
Yups, ExposureTime : 2.00Sec
how you do it?
i mean how to make the exposure time longer?
--
Posted: 2009-06-23 18:59:43
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
