Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone
Bookmark topic
I will ask once again - what do you mean saying "Depth"? explain this on your pics and Pitzon's C901 pics
--
Posted: 2009-06-28 18:30:56
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-06-28 18:30:56, Raiderski wrote:
I will ask once again - what do you mean saying "Depth"? explain this on your pics and Pitzon's C901 pics
Plankgatan has a very special relationship with his C902. Reminds me of an
old Usenet group actually...
--
Posted: 2009-06-28 19:08:05
Edit :
Quote
well, keep up the good work !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and yes, i like the Depth more with Sony's cams
summer...........summer............summer
sparkling colours____________when Samsung create this Dynamic "touch"....i might buy it
edit.....
think its hard to explain in English but i give it a go.....
when i tried c901 and c902 together, (and had a look at them on my PC) i saw that c901 was a bit more thinner, kind of "flat" into the whole point of view, i thought c902 had more
DEPTH into its images, it looked more Dynamic................enough ????
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-06-28 21:32 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-28 22:12:59
Edit :
Quote
mysterious "Depth" - legend continues...
--
Posted: 2009-06-28 22:26:04
Edit :
Quote
haha how funny
--
Posted: 2009-06-28 22:36:58
Edit :
Quote
he heeeeeeeeeeeee
you see it easiest when you looks at them in macro though. (now i mean quite big difference)
ps....Vipera, you have any clue what im talking about, have you ! (but hey, i cant possible blame you, you hardly super interested in photographing or have tried both cams...
--
Posted: 2009-06-28 22:49:27
Edit :
Quote
man, i have dslr camera, i dont care about camera in phones, but i just cant accept your obssesed statements. they are childish and stupid, you act like a 7 year old child .
c901 have better picture quality then c902, period
--
Posted: 2009-06-28 23:08:52
Edit :
Quote
well, you still dont know what im talking about. in Swedish its "foto djup" (easily translated photo depth) ok !!!!
(ask a real photographer and he will explain so even you understand
)
i also have a nice DSLR camera (Nikon D80) and there its VERY MUCH about photo depth. (if you have some kind of aesthetic photo-skills)
besides, your meaning what "good" photo-quality is
laughable...(you really think less noise and sharpness is everything)............
this is what im talking about, this is about Depth, etc, (stick around and maybe you learn something)...........
c901...........leafs are surely not white/grey-green..........they are green. (looks flat and not very Dynamics)
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c901
again....flat, no dynamic...........
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c901
c902.............this is Dynamic in my eyes, it also have more Depth.
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19719
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=20709[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-06-28 22:51 ]
--
Posted: 2009-06-28 23:36:12
Edit :
Quote
OK now I do understand what you mean by depth: you mean excessive contrast.
Now, explain to me what grandiose view means, please.
--
Posted: 2009-06-29 01:00:35
Edit :
Quote
You're using different photos made in different conditions to compare two cameras
--
Posted: 2009-06-29 02:52:21
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
