Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Raider camera driver for K790, K800 and K810 (v6.6.5)
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Raider camera driver for K790, K800 and K810 (v6.6.5)
Bookmark topic
[2008-10-19] Final Release Candidate 2
- fixed recognition of enabled permanent SEM/EM
thanks vudu70!
--
Posted: 2008-10-19 21:55:53
Edit :
Quote
@ vudu70
how did u set the hybrid SEM/EM function?
[ This Message was edited by: mirrage24 on 2008-10-20 03:12 ]
--
Posted: 2008-10-20 04:11:44
Edit :
Quote
1. Permanent hybrid EM/SEM:
- a first set in driver:
E_MODE= $s5 04; -> hybrid EM
or
E_MODE= $s5 05; -> hybrid SEM
- than select normal mode (in phone menu)
2. Fine mode hybrid EM/SEM:
- select fine mode (in phone menu)
- set EV=+0.7 (SS fast),auto ISO,no flash
- set value (with zoom key):
2=hybrid EM or 1=hybrid SEM.
--
Posted: 2008-10-20 07:52:23
Edit :
Quote
please fix this, raiderski:
bad autofocus on night condition with af!!!
--
Posted: 2008-10-20 14:37:00
Edit :
Quote
why do you think that this is bug? why do you expect good AF result in weak light? dude, this red light is very poor, don't expect miracles
--
Posted: 2008-10-20 14:41:59
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-10-20 14:41:59, Raiderski wrote:
why do you think that this is bug? why do you expect good AF result in weak light? dude, this red light is very poor, don't expect miracles
Actually, it's pretty damn good in my humble opinion, always get sharp results in night conditions. Maybe cleaning the light sensor will help (bottom left tiny senor near the main lens).
Yesterday I took a shot of a 7 meter distanced object with xenon on and ISO set to 1600... very much noise, but after some tune ups the photo looked better and I hardly believed it was taken by a phone.
Only if the xenon could be stronger.... it could yield less noise.
--
Posted: 2008-10-20 15:07:54
Edit :
Quote
yeah, IT'S A BUG!!!
will you restore autofocus at raiders v6.3.3/original k800 driver into your newest driver???
now, my short distance low light photos looks bad. i have to use manual focus, but on low light, it's hard!!!
--
Posted: 2008-10-20 15:24:36
Edit :
Quote
thank you very much for the drivers .....
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2957572527/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2957571491/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2958413810/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2958421098/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2953761985/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2953753251/
sepia:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2953747337/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2954595178/
sepia:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2953744685/
macro:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2954583774/
total dark ness with FLASH on and Macro:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2934070511/
macro:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2934863076/
sepia:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2934863052/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2934863086/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2934875342/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27849786@N03/2934875352/
--
Posted: 2008-10-20 15:27:00
Edit :
Quote
Only if the xenon could be stronger.... it could yield less noise.
you are 101% right!!!
if the xenon flash just as strong as original cybershot camera/ digital camera, it could yield less noise
--
Posted: 2008-10-20 15:30:38
Edit :
Quote
i got one small doubt ...
does any body need to use the normal quality mode ?
if yes, then why ?
i only use fine mode ...
And can't the quality be more increased ? like no compression ?
dont mind .. i just dont know much about it ...
and thank you raider ....
take care
Bye
--
Posted: 2008-10-20 15:31:28
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply