Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 187188189 ... 462463464>

heins Posts: 152

The 5.6c driver im using is MR e_erzan`s latest one, it must be the weather conditions that made me take this good pic
--
Posted: 2006-09-14 23:49:36
Edit : Quote

gprsman Posts: 269

Hello to all it compliments for the carried out job.

I have on mine k750 5.6c last contrast adjustment, I must test by day. Where I can find 5.6c spot removed and that it means? also 5.6U contrast adjustment where I can find? Which to be better compromise between nocturne and day? Thanks you are large.
--
Posted: 2006-09-14 23:53:21
Edit : Quote

mervy Posts: 334

Quote:
On 2006-09-14 23:48:59, ToryXX wrote:
mervi....but in your pictures,from 5.6 c and 5.6 u...i see that 5.6u is more good quality,and more clear than 5.6c....also how is writing !...more sharp


Thats coz i think i shook it. i had my phone placed on the side view mirrors for a better unshaken photo. but i guess my car had its engine vibrating a bit. I had to drive 10 minutes at 12am in the night to click that pic ( the pics says the time). after i reached home i changed the driver and then i went back to the same place. So i was too lazy to go again the third time and click the pic. lol
--
Posted: 2006-09-14 23:53:34
Edit : Quote

heins Posts: 152

Quote:
On 2006-09-14 23:53:34, mervy wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-09-14 23:48:59, ToryXX wrote:
mervi....but in your pictures,from 5.6 c and 5.6 u...i see that 5.6u is more good quality,and more clear than 5.6c....also how is writing !...more sharp


Thats coz i think i shook it. i had my phone placed on the side view mirrors for a better unshaken photo. but i guess my car had its engine vibrating a bit. I had to drive 10 minutes at 12am in the night to click that pic ( the pics says the time). after i reached home i changed the driver and then i went back to the same place. So i was too lazy to go again the third time and click the pic. lol



Have uyou tested daylight photos with c and d? and what kb do you get on the c and d comparison?

--
Posted: 2006-09-15 00:02:35
Edit : Quote

mervy Posts: 334

Quote:
On 2006-09-14 23:43:54, Rennedy wrote:
hey mervy ...
witch 5.6 are u using ?? there was a lot of them around here...
can you post the link for download ??

thanx mate



I got it from

http://www.filefactory.com/file/1b7270/
http://rapidshare.de/files/33068382/camdriver0.dat

Some of the other pics clicked on the 5.6 with adjusted contrast.

http://img133.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc02497om3.jpg




http://img223.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc02498pd0.jpg




http://img157.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc02505je8.jpg




--
Posted: 2006-09-15 00:03:26
Edit : Quote

ToryXX Posts: 495

well this it was now in the evening,macro OFF,light on,night on..with 5.6c without buffer 600k contrast adjusted!



[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-09-15 00:01 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-15 00:04:27
Edit : Quote

gprsman Posts: 269

Quote:
On 2006-09-14 23:43:51, heins wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-09-14 23:09:57, rondstif wrote:
Heins, could you send the version that you have used in this photo? I canīt find it


This is 5.6c with spot removed,so no more overexpoxure...
http://www.filefactory.com/file/1b7270/
http://rapidshare.de/files/33068382/camdriver0.dat



I do not succeed to unload to rapidshare, please you can put on sendspace.com? if you have also 5.6 u please contrast adjustment? thanks.
--
Posted: 2006-09-15 00:04:29
Edit : Quote

arash_a Posts: 31

Whats diffrent on

5.6C with spot removed
&
5.6U with contrast adjusted

?
--
Posted: 2006-09-15 00:14:12
Edit : Quote

gprsman Posts: 269

Quote:
On 2006-09-15 00:14:12, arash_a wrote:
Whats diffrent on

5.6C with spot removed
&
5.6U with contrast adjusted

?


Yes thanks

I do not succeed to make download to rapidshare of both camdriver, please you can put it on other host? from sendspace.com I succeed.



--
Posted: 2006-09-15 00:19:01
Edit : Quote

mervy Posts: 334

Quote:
On 2006-09-14 23:53:34, mervy wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-09-14 23:48:59, ToryXX wrote:
mervi....but in your pictures,from 5.6 c and 5.6 u...i see that 5.6u is more good quality,and more clear than 5.6c....also how is writing !...more sharp


Thats coz i think i shook it. i had my phone placed on the side view mirrors for a better unshaken photo. but i guess my car had its engine vibrating a bit. I had to drive 10 minutes at 12am in the night to click that pic ( the pics says the time). after i reached home i changed the driver and then i went back to the same place. So i was too lazy to go again the third time and click the pic. lol




OOOOPPPPSSS!!!!!
Hold on a sec!!
I guess u are right, ToryXX. The 5.6u is more sharper in the night compared to 5.6c with spot removed. I concluded this because i have another pair of pics that prove the blurry 5.6c photos.

5.6c
http://img178.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc02635vp0.jpg



5.6u
http://img175.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc02623ws7.jpg



Damn!!!! Can anyone else try out the pics at night with something that is readable. I mean, pics of advertisement boards etc.
--
Posted: 2006-09-15 00:20:28
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 187188189 ... 462463464>

New Topic   Topic Locked
Forum Index

Esato home