Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post your pictures (and videos) taken with your K800i / K790a
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Post your pictures (and videos) taken with your K800i / K790a Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 192021 ... 128129130>

peltsi Posts: 69

Few more pics to all=)

Some Stores


Our Church


Same Church in black&white


Sunset


Nice sunset



Amy comments etc=)?!
--
Posted: 2006-07-10 10:20:46
Edit : Quote

admad Posts: > 500

Nice pics, btw what is wrong with this cross at the church?
--
Posted: 2006-07-10 10:43:21
Edit : Quote

rockygali Posts: > 500

it has rays... what about it?
--
Posted: 2006-07-10 10:46:14
Edit : Quote

admad Posts: > 500

It'a amazing, can u take close shot, or post full size pic?
--
Posted: 2006-07-10 14:03:02
Edit : Quote

02 Posts: > 500

HHmm... this is sad... i dont see much improvements for a SE 3.2MP cam. I was really hoping to get this..

Pictures are not clear, and colours are washed. Contrast is below par. Heres a comparison with my Sharp903 3.2MP cam, quality is reduced by esato tho..

Indoor Bright Lights



Bright Outdoor


Indoor Dim Lights

--
Posted: 2006-07-10 14:48:11
Edit : Quote

Arne Anka Posts: > 500

O2,

unfortenately with reduced size of the pictures its not possible to see big differences beween 903 and K800. If you have both K800 and 903, perhaps picture of same object and full size pictures would be easier to compare.

I believe sharp 903 is bigger than K800 and hence should be able to fit better components than K800 (e.g. bigger sensor etc.), which should be able to give better pictures .
--
Posted: 2006-07-10 17:09:14
Edit : Quote

peltsi Posts: 69

Quote:
On 2006-07-10 14:03:02, admad wrote:
It'a amazing, can u take close shot, or post full size pic?


I can try to get closer but is damn high so i think thas not possible..=/

--
Posted: 2006-07-10 21:46:55
Edit : Quote

taniame Posts: 82

@Arne

Yes, you are correct. 903 is much bigger actually. Here in the states, some of my friends laughed at it at first sight claiming: Must be an old phone with big butt size.

Keep in mind 903 has 2x OZ which totally beats K800.

However, for a 3.2 MP af only camera, why you need OZ for? You are not going to print out your cell phone photo for exhibitions............
--
Posted: 2006-07-10 22:48:43
Edit : Quote

Arne Anka Posts: > 500

That's my point. Its a trade off between phone size and picture quality. The bigger it is the more and bigger components can be put into it to get better picture quality. Think K800 does a pretty good job concidering the size of it (still need some improvements in the auto settings). Haven't seen any other 3 Mpx phone of same size and form factor as K800 providing better picture quality.


[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2006-07-10 22:56 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-10 23:55:44
Edit : Quote

basoost Posts: 154

Pop Larkins Rolls Royce from the Darling Buds of May:




--
Posted: 2006-07-11 10:54:42
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 192021 ... 128129130>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home