General discussions : General : Compare phones and brands ( Previous Title : Why SE is better than Nokia?)
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> Compare phones and brands ( Previous Title : Why SE is better than Nokia?)
Bookmark topic
@ sexythang ( i hope you're a girl, i would never say that to a guy
)
I used to own the SPV when I worked for Orange, and besides battery life, I was very satisfied with it. But I don't know what happened, only one release a year almost, i thought they would make much more of an impact.
To address the nokia issue, I used to like Nokia, until I learned about cell phones lol No seriously, very user friendly, but it's been a while since I've seen a nice looking Nokia phone, it was possibly the 8910i in my opinion.
--
Posted: 2004-06-16 21:28:49
Edit :
Quote
Nokias are suitable for small children and old people.
--
Posted: 2004-06-16 21:39:08
Edit :
Quote
sorry i dont know what you were referring too....
6630 looks like a bestseller as well...
as for the looks depratment....i would say 8850....timeless design....
hehehe.......so when you get old you're gonna switch to a nokia?
generalized states arent good.
i think it would have helped k700 alot if it had memory expansion....much more useful....and it would beat the crap outa 6230
[ This Message was edited by: SexyThang on 2004-06-16 20:49 ]
--
Posted: 2004-06-16 21:42:15
Edit :
Quote
I am referring to the fact that Nokias lack features, by the time they do get around to releasing phones with decent features they are obsolete because everyone else has moved on. The design element is appalling, they are either old designs tarted up a bit, completely whacky or, as in the case of some of the more recent models, copies of designs used by other manufacturers.
Nokia need to concentrate on quality over quantity.
--
Posted: 2004-06-16 21:48:27
Edit :
Quote
s700 or k700 will sell most?
--
Posted: 2004-06-23 22:04:20
Edit :
Quote
K700, its aimed at the youth market like the T610.
The S700 will also sell well but only with the more hard core phone enthusiasts, due to its higher price, unless it is priced the same as the K700 is now when its been out a couple of months.
--
Posted: 2004-06-23 23:15:11
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-06-16 21:48:27, scotsboyuk wrote:
Nokia need to concentrate on quality over quantity.
very good point. i hope nokia reads this.
--
Posted: 2005-11-23 03:35:21
Edit :
Quote
Oh yeah? Than read this!
"NOKIA 8800"
--
Posted: 2005-11-23 05:05:00
Edit :
Quote
Nokia 8800? What's good from this phone except the better casing and highest price? The quality inside, I mean, features, IMHO is in the same level of average mid-end phones.
I don't think that scotsboyuk meant is the quality like that but in overall, not only considering that premium or fashion phones.
--
Posted: 2005-11-23 05:23:11
Edit :
Quote
8800 is awrong example, its a special fone, cannot be measured with everyday usage fones. all i can say to se and nokia, since ERICSSON stopped making mobile fones ( and is busy now - more the ever - in the background ), i couldnt find a fone ( brand ) which really fit my needs. i accept 3 brands in the whole entire world: nokia, moto and sE, all others are just bad jokes for me. anyway, in the last time a started to use nokia, cos no sE 3g fones fitted my taste. i dont like 6680, but it was yet the best solution among 3g fones, it serves me well. i do hope, that in the next future this 3 brands will rule the market and a kind of cooperation ( like once at bt )would be nice to see, to force the toy-brands ( samsung, lg etc ) to stay in the background, let them copy ech other and let the "adults" lead the market. as i see sE and nokia should make a kind of "deal", maybe moto aswell, so the european brands ( at u.s. cos of moto ) shall show the right direction in future mobile technology.
--
Posted: 2005-11-23 06:04:27
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
