Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : AAC vs MP3 on the K750
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > AAC vs MP3 on the K750 Bookmark topic
Page <  123456>

johnpete Posts: 60

^ and amr, if you want to use a recording (or a recorded conversation hehehe) you did as ringtone.

max_wedge, would it yield the same results if you encoded your songs directly from cd to 96kpbs aac instead of from the 128 mp3s? or do you think it may even sound better than the mp3s? i have the old version of dbpoweramp, but it only gives the option to convert to lame, ogg vorbis and wave files. thanks
--
Posted: 2005-09-22 08:20:50
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

when I record direct from cd to mp4 (say 96Kbps) the file size is actually slightly larger, and the quality slightly better, but not much.

Keep in mind a nicely ripped 128Kbps mp3 has enough audio info to sound just as good as a 96Kbps AAC. While there is a small advantage ripping direct from cd, if the original mp3 is good anyway, there isn't much point. dbpoweramp does an excellent job of transcoding.

However if the mp3 is poorly ripped (shitty codec or low bitrate) then obviously it won't get any better when ripped as an AAC. And if I want to rip 128Kbps AAC files, then I need atleast a 192Kbps MP3 or the original cd, for there to be any point in doing that.

Keep in mind my ear ain't that fussy. Some peeps would insist on ALWAYS ripping direct from CD (or cd quality wav) to get the maximum quality possible. Those peeps probably also code in atleast 192Kbps for MP3 and 128Kbps for AAC, if not higher.

So it comes down to personal preference to some extent....
--
Posted: 2005-09-25 05:28:32
Edit : Quote

funtoosh Posts: 137

both are almost same...
--
Posted: 2005-09-25 20:44:58
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

johnpete, head over to the dbpoweramp codec section and download FAAC.
--
Posted: 2005-09-26 02:45:28
Edit : Quote

johnpete Posts: 60

max_wedge, really great inputs, thanks much! i'll try to do some tests to see what my ears prefer as well. thanks for pointing me to FAAC
--
Posted: 2005-09-26 11:38:11
Edit : Quote

caff Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2005-09-26 02:45:28, max_wedge wrote:
johnpete, head over to the dbpoweramp codec section and download FAAC.


Where to download FAAC ?..........Thanks !
--
Posted: 2005-09-26 12:06:30
Edit : Quote

xanathar Posts: 5

http://www.dbpoweramp.com/codec-central-mp4.htm
download the codec on the top (m4a, mp4 and apple lossless codec)
--
Posted: 2005-09-26 12:16:11
Edit : Quote

caff Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2005-09-26 12:16:11, xanathar wrote:
http://www.dbpoweramp.com/codec-central-mp4.htm
download the codec on the top (m4a, mp4 and apple lossless codec)


Thanks ! So u guys think aac quality is better?
--
Posted: 2005-09-26 15:49:40
Edit : Quote

ares Posts: > 500

of course...itīs newer, is technologicaly more advanced, itīs better

it was created to replace mp3 (hence mp4)
--
Posted: 2005-09-26 15:51:24
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

aac rocks....
--
Posted: 2005-09-26 15:56:20
Edit : Quote
Page <  123456>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home