Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : se d750i ( 2.0 mp )vs nokia 6680 ( 1.3 mp )
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > se d750i ( 2.0 mp )vs nokia 6680 ( 1.3 mp ) Bookmark topic
Page <  123

BobaFett Posts: > 500

@numd thx for the nice comment and for the pix. i do get your point, would be interesting to know, what lenses are using nokia and se ( just asked the same in another thread )
--
Posted: 2005-10-27 05:40:28
Edit : Quote

numb Posts: > 500

thx

Notice the stuffed fox, it was sitting inside a glass montre, the picture is taken from outside the montre through the glass. I was amazed how well it turned out

And youre aboslutely right, the difference is that the 6680 still looks like a mobilecam at its best, while the K750 at its best doesnt and can pass for a real digicam.


--
Posted: 2005-10-27 05:43:41
Edit : Quote

BobaFett Posts: > 500

but why are those nokia piy so "blue"? guess if i would experiment with the settings, the result would be way better. but i am too lazy, i got used to be served by my fones without extra settings ( ericsson illness ;- )
--
Posted: 2005-10-27 05:47:42
Edit : Quote

numb Posts: > 500

hehe - yeah I know what you mean

The blue tint is caused by the nokia not being able to determine proper whitebalance as good as the S//E. It could propably be improved by experimenting with the cam settings in the nokia. And it could be "fixed" in an imageeditor like photoshop.

Another "typical" nokia cam thing, is that there imagingsoftware incorporates a softenfilter in order to remove noice in the picture, that can be a good thing, especially in low light conditions where noice typically appear, but it comes at the expense of detail. Detail that you wont be able to bring back, even in the best imageeditor.

You can see this difference in the 2 pictures posted by sasha-se, where theres a difference of detail in the bricks on the walls of the building.

Overall though, the 6680 cam is pretty descent for a mobile 1.3mpix cam, and you can certainly get descent pictures with it. Just gotter work a litle bit more with settings and sometimes possibly touch it up a litle in photoshop.

Also worth mentioning for those reading that are not familiare with the K750. Just because we can post very good pictures here, doesnt mean we allways get this kind of quality from the K750. I take just as many average shots with my K750 as I take good shots. But some times you get everything right, angle, lighting, settings etc. and they just turn out great.
--
Posted: 2005-10-27 06:13:01
Edit : Quote

BobaFett Posts: > 500

dont tell me about it ;-) sometiems i had to make several shots for a good one. next to the cam the big display is very helpful ( not just at the pix ) , actually i wouldnt release any 2mp fone with such a "small" display, as in k750i.
--
Posted: 2005-10-27 06:18:02
Edit : Quote

numb Posts: > 500

True, if there should be anything Id like to change on my otherwise beloved K750, it would be a bigger screen. Allthough the "small" screen wasnt enough for me not to get it, I would surely not have minded if it were bigger.

To be honest the perfect phone doesnt exist for me - propably never will.

But at the time I got my K750, it was the best bet at a small, compact, well featured, reasonably priced phone. And so far it has served my needs well

Next time Im buying a phone, my needs and wishes may have changed, therefore I cant say what my next phone will be, or even if it will be an S//E. It all depends.
--
Posted: 2005-10-27 06:36:07
Edit : Quote

BobaFett Posts: > 500

another question: 6680 has got 262k display, but the resolution is pretty bad, so mostly it looks like 65k. why is that? how comes that in k750 is more clear?
--
Posted: 2005-10-27 06:56:39
Edit : Quote

jcpsad Posts: > 500

Quote:
Notice the stuffed fox, it was sitting inside a glass montre, the picture is taken from outside the montre through the glass. I was amazed how well it turned out


whoa! i wouldn't have noticed it if you didn't tell me... simply amazing huh! sometimes good photographs comes with great precision.
--
Posted: 2005-10-27 06:59:10
Edit : Quote

mario2002 Posts: > 500

Hmm . . . I never relized the 6680's cam is so good.It will be interesting to see some pictures taken in poor lighting conditions like pubs and night clubs on the spur of the moment (for more serious stuff I anyway use my 'proper' cam) also how about the video quality ? And lastly - keep in mind one buys a 750 for its camera whereas my 2 work buddies use their 6680's as high speed EDGE modems for their laptops. This message was posted from a Nokia 7650
--
Posted: 2005-10-28 16:34:30
Edit : Quote

BobaFett Posts: > 500

video quaility is acceptable, but i tested it only for a short time.
--
Posted: 2005-10-28 19:34:02
Edit : Quote
Page <  123

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home