>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> You have been Warned
Bookmark topic
lmao - how do any of you know that was dynamite? you dont.... the pics dont show anything at all..... if you guys are experts nd can demonstrate that these are actual pictures of dynamite, you'd convince people... otherwise you just fuelling a 'story' nothing more.....
As jim said...... where do you think the air goes....?
Also what about the services within the building? dont you think these will explod during such a event (by event i mean... aeroplane hitting the building - building burning for 30-45mins - floors collapsing).......
I think way too many people make assumptions and do not actually find out the truth.... if i were to make such a statement i would try and back it up... not simply circle a puff of smoke coming out of teh side of the building......
dont get me wrong, ive talked to many people on here and outside esato about this and there is more top it than meets the eye..... but come on peeps, lets back things up
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 15:05:26
Edit :
Quote
I still find it hard to believe that two buildings would collapse straight down!!
One ok maybe, but not the second one...
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 15:33:18
Edit :
Quote
mate, thats how they were designed - infact its how every skyscraper is built (everyone i can think of)........
Thats a fact mate and tbh it doenst need justifying does it? think about the mass destruction if one were to fall side ways....... one word comes to mind - dominos!
rather than stick loads of quotes in this page i thought id offer a link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/[....]01/worldtradecentertrans.shtml
this gives a lot of info some true, some skeptical...... (make your own opinions)....
I honestly believe the attack was a us gov planned event... but i seriously believe they did not expect the building to fall...... the amount of lives lost is sickening and if the us gov was to blame....... god help us all!
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 15:51:31
Edit :
Quote
i find it hard 2 believe the terrorists that hijacked the planes where armed only with small knives.
also i dont know why there was no plane parts found at the scene of the pentegon crash
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 15:52:03
Edit :
Quote
ummm... lots of unanswered questions aint there......
im only going on about the way they fell because im a architect and i know that all skyscrapers are designed to fall the exact way they did and it is common to see explosions when a bulding is full of services that are not dis-conected...... rememeber - the reason you wouldnt see explosions within a controlled demollition because the building will have been made safe by a services engineer.......
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 15:57:24
Edit :
Quote
props
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 16:01:22
Edit :
Quote
one quote from that website i quoted above:
'NARRATOR: The building fell away from the side into which the jet had crashed. In fact the building fell towards the side where the fire was most concentrated and this suggests that a very particular mechanism was at work. The crucial damage occurred just after the plane smashed into the tower. It slammed along the eastern wall weakening the outer skeleton's steel columns on that side. It also began a fierce fire concentrated in the north-east corner. The theory is the heat of the fire softened not only the floor trusses but also the walls of the outer skeleton they were attached to. When the steel was sufficiently weakened by the heat the walls and the trusses would have pulled apart and without the trusses to hold them rigid the columns of the outer walls started to bend and then fail.'
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 16:03:44
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-02-28 16:03:44, leeboy13 wrote:
one quote from that website i quoted above:
'NARRATOR: The building fell away from the side into which the jet had crashed. In fact the building fell towards the side where the fire was most concentrated and this suggests that a very particular mechanism was at work. The crucial damage occurred just after the plane smashed into the tower. It slammed along the eastern wall weakening the outer skeleton's steel columns on that side. It also began a fierce fire concentrated in the north-east corner. The theory is the heat of the fire softened not only the floor trusses but also the walls of the outer skeleton they were attached to. When the steel was sufficiently weakened by the heat the walls and the trusses would have pulled apart and without the trusses to hold them rigid the columns of the outer walls started to bend and then fail.'
I am soo sorry but thats rubbish, if it was soo hot why are there people standing on the edge? im sure they would of been fried if it was too hot, dont you think?
_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
NEW WORLD ORDER:
www.prisonplanet.net www.infowars.com[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2006-02-28 18:03 ]
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 19:01:54
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-02-28 15:52:03, brownlad007 wrote:
i find it hard 2 believe the terrorists that hijacked the planes where armed only with small knives.
also i dont know why there was no plane parts found at the scene of the pentegon crash
Well not only that, what happened to NORAD? i though America was one of the best armies in the world? and had the best technology, AND YET they couldnt spot 4 planes espeacially they were off its normal route? Ohh please guys give me a break.
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 19:21:58
Edit :
Quote
Why do you think people ended their life by jumping ? It's a disgrace to them to say it wasn't hot. Shame on you ! I'm off of here, it turned back to an 9/11 discussion.
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 19:34:58
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
