>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Technical
> Portable Speakers MPS-60 Modification
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2006-06-30 06:35:59, IRFCA_WDG-3A wrote:
LOL, this is getting fooking crazy and OT......time to get this thread shifted, Masseur!
Not at all. Go people go. This is simply marvelous.
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 12:36:43
Edit :
Quote
The hulk has been working out.......
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 14:04:06
Edit :
Quote
i'm sorry to say that no ipod will ever come close to listening to a portable CD player, as the sound hasn't been compressed , and 95% of the orignal recording removed.
but well done to the chap with the closed headphones plugged into his home made setup.
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 14:11:32
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-30 14:11:32, batesie wrote:
i'm sorry to say that no ipod will ever come close to listening to a portable CD player, as the sound hasn't been compressed , and 95% of the orignal recording removed.
but well done to the chap with the closed headphones plugged into his home made setup.
I'm sorry but I have to dis-agree........any idiot can chop wires in half and attach them to a set of speakers or headphones.
It's not exactly rocket science nor something to brag about in a forum is it.
[ This Message was edited by: hairytea on 2006-06-30 13:24 ]
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 14:23:03
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-30 14:11:32, batesie wrote:
i'm sorry to say that no ipod will ever come close to listening to a portable CD player, as the sound hasn't been compressed , and 95% of the orignal recording removed.
But if u rip a cd at 192kbps on to your pc and then transfer to your ipod its the same quality! an ipod is capable of playing much higher bitrates
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 15:29:06
Edit :
Quote
it really aint the same quality mate
this is widley known..... cd vs mp3 = no competition
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 15:54:41
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-30 15:54:41, leeboy13 wrote:
it really aint the same quality mate
this is widley known..... cd vs mp3 = no competition
Who uses .mp3 anymore. Try AAC or Lossless.
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 17:36:19
Edit :
Quote
ok acc/lossless vs cd = no contest! i think youre missing teh point
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 17:38:47
Edit :
Quote
@leeboy, agreed, any form of conversion/compression results in loss in quality, therefore cds still sound better.
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 17:52:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-30 17:38:47, leeboy13 wrote:
ok acc/lossless vs cd = no contest! i think youre missing teh point
No, I think you are missing the point. The object of this thread was to demonstrate that in the originators mind, his w810i is the best .mp3 player ever created. He is still wrong. Second, he was demonstrating that by destroying a speaker system and using the amp sound quality is further enhanced. Debatable but I will go with this premise. Everyone knows that a CD will sound better than a converted file. Duhhhh!!!!! So I do not see what the debate is here. I was talking about putting converted sounds, i.e. AAC or Loseless on an iPod as opposed to using .mp3.
Soooooo, I think anything that does not refer back to destroying a portable sound system is moot, including my posts as well.
I think we are now clear on this.
--
Posted: 2006-06-30 18:20:45
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
