>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> more colors
Bookmark topic
thats what i thought myself, i though passive matrix was a tft, but was not sure... oh well.
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 01:49:00
Edit :
Quote
Nah..sure its not TFT, if you compare the screen of 7210 to samsung T100, then u know the different, which one is TFT , which one is STN !!!!
[ This Message was edited by: caff on 2002-10-20 02:37 ]
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 03:36:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2002-10-19 03:04, jplacson wrote:
Sony has a new screen technology... 206,000 colors... 320x480 res.
I doubt anyone else has similar technology. That's like an 18-bit or so screen.
Could you point to more info on that?
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 06:28:00
Edit :
Quote
What really pisses me off is that Sony made the sexiest PDA screens on earth to date (Clie) and they did not port over those super sexy screen technology over to the T68i. But I love my T68i nevertheless. No more PDA for me. All I need to carry is my T68i. *me kisses the T68i*
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 08:06:00
Edit :
Quote
Netguy2 Passive matrix display= STN (note passive matrix)
Active matrix display = TFT (note active matrix) Just like they use in all lap top for the last few years. Older lap tops used to use STN also and it was cheaper. Higher end machines had TFT only. Now adays all lap tops use tft prices have come down alot.
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 08:48:00
Edit :
Quote
the reason they haven't put the sony lcd on the t68i's is simply because its the exact same phone as the t68 from ericsson, back then when it was out they haven't been in a venture or whatever, it's ericsson's technology we are using, the odd thing is that why haven't they improved the screen with t300, i realize that it is a budget phone, however i see people sell t68i replacement lcds on ebay for 20 bucks, that makes it not so expensive type of part, so i guess they could have equiped the t300s with some better screens... but what can you do, they just did not...
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 08:51:00
Edit :
Quote
when you look at the 7650 screen and T68i screen there are no big difrens!
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 12:13:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2002-10-20 12:13, juzuxel wrote:
when you look at the 7650 screen and T68i screen there are no big difrens!
You must be joking, right?
I've got them both, and the diff is huge.
On the 7650 screen you can see details of a photo, on T68 you can't.
On the 7650 screen green and yellow colors are bright,
on the T68 they're brownish.
When the T68 screen pixelises the photos, because of the limited
colors, the 7650 screen shows them crisp and clear.
I'm not saying that the T68 screen is bad, just that a 4096 color
screen (STN or TFT) is so much better.
Just like you would compare Mono, Stereo and Dolby Prologic/Surround.
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 12:46:00
Edit :
Quote
Froddan is right
I've got two days the 7650 and the colours were brilliant.
The images were crisp and colorfull. I thought that the 7650 screen was TFT, due the good image quality and when you were in sunlight conditions, you could read the text clearly and with no reflects. (as TFT screens do)
NetGuy2
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 13:17:00
Edit :
Quote
maybe i have something wrong whit my eyes!!
but there is a difrens
but its not soooo BIG...
--
Posted: 2002-10-20 14:30:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
